flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
![]() Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next |
Author |
|
m 12 Jul 2007, 12:08
Winsock example - II
This one uses threads to handle multiple (10) client requests at a time!
_________________ Attitude! |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
Furby 12 Jul 2007, 19:17
[m] make the whole website in asm as a CGI :O would be cool and fast :O
|
|||
![]() |
|
m 13 Jul 2007, 04:11
Wow!
Nice idea! |
|||
![]() |
|
m 13 Jul 2007, 10:49
Menu example!
_________________ Attitude! Last edited by m on 19 Jul 2007, 10:03; edited 1 time in total |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
dead_body 13 Jul 2007, 11:50
m
good. write more ![]() Can write an example of work with proxy? (to downolad a file using proxy.) And example with shell? |
|||
![]() |
|
m 13 Jul 2007, 12:36
I'll try!
Last edited by m on 17 Jul 2007, 09:25; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
Furby 13 Jul 2007, 16:44
Your using fasm during work ?
|
|||
![]() |
|
m 14 Jul 2007, 04:16
I love assembly programming!
_________________ Attitude! Last edited by m on 17 Jul 2007, 09:26; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
m 14 Jul 2007, 04:20
Thanks mattst88!
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
m 19 Jul 2007, 14:43
Check for MMX
_________________ Attitude! |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
mattst88 19 Jul 2007, 17:38
Furby wrote: [m] make the whole website in asm as a CGI :O would be cool and fast :O I can't see how that would be faster than transmitting plain HTML. |
|||
![]() |
|
m 20 Jul 2007, 05:51
Now this board is parsing .php files and sending the results.
This needs php processing (which is slow). A CGI written in asm can be quite fast! |
|||
![]() |
|
m 20 Jul 2007, 13:04
Black is beautiful.
_________________ Attitude! |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
ssp 24 Jul 2007, 12:14
Hi brother!
You was saying that i should leave assembly and you yourself are admitting that 'you love assembly language' Tel me Why???????????????????????????????? |
|||
![]() |
|
m 24 Jul 2007, 12:40
That's ok.
You can still program in other languages even if you like assembly. And for something real, you should not use assembly. For making toys, assembly is ok. |
|||
![]() |
|
rugxulo 25 Jul 2007, 06:02
m wrote: That's ok. You can always use both, even at the same time. But some things can't be done without some assembly by someone (CPUID, determine if you're in V86 mode, switch to long mode, etc). We're not suggesting you write all assembly by hand, manually modifying the offsets every time something changes (like Woz did for the Apple 2, sheesh). But assembly is indeed useful, not hugely more difficult than any other language, and there is good support for it for most OSes. Actually, I like the idea of a lot of HLLs (e.g. Forth, XPL0, FreeBASIC), just haven't really gotten fluent in any yet. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
kohlrak 25 Jul 2007, 07:08
Why not make something "real" in assembly?
|
|||
![]() |
|
0.1 25 Jul 2007, 10:44
Do you mean sale-able by "real"?
|
|||
![]() |
|
vador 25 Jul 2007, 11:16
Quote:
For many many many many other things too. Eg: bootloaders |
|||
![]() |
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2025, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.