[DONE] function(params) -> invoke function,params

Index > Macroinstructions > [DONE] function(params) -> invoke function,params

Author

Thread

dead_body

Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 187
Location: Ukraine,Kharkov

dead_body 20 Dec 2006, 22:13

this is a demonstrate of fasm preprocessor power Very Happy

ther are two files.
one file have macroses to change syntax, second file contains the names of functions.

this macroses only replace some part of string.

for example:

Code:

;first declare it:

hllToFuncProcEx my_func:invoke

;and then you can use it:

my_func(param1,param2)

;and these macroses will change this string to:

invoke my_func,<param1>,<param2>

or something else:

Code:

hllToFuncProcEx text.write:libcall

;use it!

text.write(stream.stdout,\<"test string",10\>)

;it will be:

libcall text.write,<stream.stdout>,\<"test string",10\>

why in last example \< needed see this topic:
http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=6293

nesting is supported.

example:

Code:

hllToFuncProcEx my_func1:invoke,my_func2:stdcall,my_func3:my_call_function


my_func1(my_func2(1,<"test",13,10>,my_func3()),my_func3(argument1))

;will be like next:

invoke my_func1,<stdcall my_func2,<1>,<'test',13,10>,<my_call_function my_func3>>,<my_call_function my_func3,<argument1>>

Description:		Download
Filename:	syntax_script.zip
Filesize:	1.33 KB
Downloaded:	341 Time(s)

20 Dec 2006, 22:13

Tomasz Grysztar

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 8434
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar 20 Dec 2006, 23:52

A little additional macro for another syntax modification:

Code:

macro pushd arg
{
  define arg@pushd
  irps x,arg
  \{ define tmp@pushd x
     match ~,tmp@pushd \\{ arg@pushd equ arg@pushd,
                           define tmp@pushd \\}
     match s,tmp@pushd \\{ arg@pushd equ arg@pushd tmp@pushd \\} \}
  match converted,arg@pushd \{ pushd <converted> \}
}

Combined with your allows:

Code:

MessageBox(HWND_DESKTOP,"First line"~13~10~'Second line',"Example message",MB_OK)

What do you think? Wink

20 Dec 2006, 23:52

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7103
Location: Slovakia

vid 20 Dec 2006, 23:58

i have own version of pushd used with libcall Razz

Wouldn't it work by fixing ( and ) to <> just inside processing macro, and then fix them back?

20 Dec 2006, 23:58

dead_body

Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 187
Location: Ukraine,Kharkov

dead_body 21 Dec 2006, 07:36

Quote:

What do you think?

unusual, but interesting.

this officially? Question

21 Dec 2006, 07:36

Tomasz Grysztar

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 8434
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar 21 Dec 2006, 07:42

Not, it's not official. Just an interesting thought about simulating D syntax. Smile

21 Dec 2006, 07:42

Raedwulf

Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 375
Location: United Kingdom

Raedwulf 21 Dec 2006, 10:59

Very pretty

21 Dec 2006, 10:59

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum