Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Location: Kraków, Poland
Please provide more context, what version of fasm does this concern, what is the entire source tested, what are the generated bytes, etc.
I have tested this single line with both the fasm 1.71.58 and the latest fasmg macros and they both assemble this instruction as "66 0F C5 C2 01", which is neither SSE4 nor AVX, but plain old SSE2.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum