Everything is memory (paraphrasing UNIX paradigm)

Index > Projects and Ideas > Everything is memory (paraphrasing UNIX paradigm)

Author

Thread

baldr

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 1651

baldr 25 Sep 2010, 18:31

With all that MMF/MMIO stuff, can we get to the point where everything could be treated as some region in memory? x86-64 got pretty much of available logical/linear memory to allocate. I thought about that for a couple of years, yet there is at least one obstacle: I/O completion. Both sides of communication have to have some means to notify other end of tube that the transfer is complete.

If anybody is interested, I can arrange an essay on my proceedings.

25 Sep 2010, 18:31

edfed

Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 4358
Location: Now

edfed 25 Sep 2010, 18:40

learn IBM AS400. it is exactlly this kind of concept, everything in memory (address space) but it needs many more than a X86 to achieve that because of the limited adress bus. even X86-64 is limited to 40 bits on phisical adress bus, leading to under capabilities compared to as400.

25 Sep 2010, 18:40

baldr

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 1651

baldr 25 Sep 2010, 18:54

edfed,

I slightly know AS/400 (why do you think I've mentioned MMIO?). The idea is to interact with any device through a region in memory.

USB Flash? Read/write at xxxx, it will be updated properly. Scanner? Write parameters to yyyy, read scanned image from zzzz. Mouse? Read coordinates from tttt, write to wwww to make it shake/blink/explode. Wink

Real interaction will be done by drivers, like MMF. Physical address bitness has nothing to do with that.

25 Sep 2010, 18:54

f0dder

Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 3174
Location: Denmark

f0dder 25 Sep 2010, 21:26

I'd say you still need an interrupt mechanism for a lot of devices. Or, I guess an alternative could be a read instruction that doesn't return until the device signals it's ready - you could shoehorn an interrupt mechanism on top of that.

Would be nice if the platform had super-fast generic DMA - copying more than a few kilobyte? Set up a DMA transfer and do something else while it's going on.

25 Sep 2010, 21:26

edfed

Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 4358
Location: Now

edfed 25 Sep 2010, 21:45

baldr wrote:

edfed,

I slightly know AS/400 (why do you think I've mentioned MMIO?). The idea is to interact with any device through a region in memory.

USB Flash? Read/write at xxxx, it will be updated properly. Scanner? Write parameters to yyyy, read scanned image from zzzz. Mouse? Read coordinates from tttt, write to wwww to make it shake/blink/explode.

Real interaction will be done by drivers, like MMF. Physical address bitness has nothing to do with that.

yep, it is a global idea, and it can be achieved in many ways.
me too i am coding my stuff with this idea in mind.
everything is memory, and memory is file.
even CPU internal registers to be parts of the file system.

the problem i mainly meet for the moment is the referencing of this memory.
global? local? relative? absolute? indexed?

but it is just a concept, the application is little more complex. and needs a very well designed code. something very difficult and long to do.

_________________
Smile

fool gitlab fasmstuff
gitlab foolstuff

25 Sep 2010, 21:45

guignol

Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Posts: 761

guignol 27 Sep 2010, 12:04

Everything is paradigm (no paraphrasing, none at all)

27 Sep 2010, 12:04

baldr

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 1651

baldr 27 Sep 2010, 14:30

guignol,

Do you have something to say (apart from being a guignol)?

27 Sep 2010, 14:30

guignol

Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Posts: 761

guignol 28 Sep 2010, 12:28

bold r... bold r... revolution?

28 Sep 2010, 12:28

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20759
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 28 Sep 2010, 12:38

guignol wrote:

bold r... bold r... revolution?

This has been mentioned before:

http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?p=85164#85164

28 Sep 2010, 12:38

MHajduk

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6113
Location: Poland

MHajduk 28 Sep 2010, 12:56

guignol wrote:

bold r... bold r... revolution?

Reminds some abbreviation... maybe we could "decipher" it this way:

baldr -> B. Al. Dr. -> Doctor Alex B.

Wink

No offense, baldr, just kidding. Razz

28 Sep 2010, 12:56

revo1ution

Joined: 04 Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Location: somewhere, twiddling something

revo1ution 29 Sep 2010, 10:43

guignol wrote:

bold r... bold r... revolution?

revolution... revo1ution...

around and around Razz

29 Sep 2010, 10:43

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum