struct(macro argument)

Index > Windows > struct(macro argument)

Author

Thread

jumpex

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 38

jumpex 27 Jul 2010, 14:12

Simple question that I couldn't find an answer for.

Code:

[...]
stem SYSTEMTIME
[...]
invoke GetLocalTime,stem
[...]
macro tim tst
{
 [...]
 xor eax,eax
 mov ax,[tst.wDay]
 [...]
}

Quote:

Error: undefined symbol 'tst.wDay'.

If I use [stem] in the macro directly - it works.
How do I pass the structure as an argument to it?

27 Jul 2010, 14:12

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20759
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 27 Jul 2010, 14:25

Use the hash:

Code:

mov ax,[tst#.wDay]

27 Jul 2010, 14:25

jumpex

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 38

jumpex 27 Jul 2010, 14:34

Yes. That worked. #

Now why didn't I find that anywhere?
If you don't have a source where I can read about it (which I am sure you will, but) - how does it work?

27 Jul 2010, 14:34

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20759
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 27 Jul 2010, 14:51

http://flatassembler.net/docs.php?article=manual#2.3.3 wrote:

Inside macroinstruction also special operator # can be used. This operator causes two names to be concatenated into one name. It can be useful, because it's done after the arguments and local names are replaced with their values.

27 Jul 2010, 14:51

jumpex

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 38

jumpex 27 Jul 2010, 14:53

Now I remember.
Thank you.

27 Jul 2010, 14:53

jumpex

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 38

jumpex 27 Jul 2010, 21:29

It's offtopic, but it's too small of a question to start a new thread about.

Code:

[...]
lamb rb 128
[...]
;do something with lamb
mov dword[lamb],0
[...]

I want to "clear" [lamb], as I append strings to it.
Is this a correct way to do so?
If not - what is the correct way?

Again - sorry for the offtopic.

27 Jul 2010, 21:29

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20759
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 27 Jul 2010, 21:35

Do you want to clear (set to zero) the entire 128 bytes? Are you using null terminated strings?

27 Jul 2010, 21:35

jumpex

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 38

jumpex 27 Jul 2010, 22:13

Yes. Yes.

27 Jul 2010, 22:13

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20759
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 27 Jul 2010, 22:23

Since you are using null terminated strings then this will suffice:

Code:

mov [lamb],0

There is no need to clear the entire array, the first zero is enough.

27 Jul 2010, 22:23

jumpex

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 38

jumpex 27 Jul 2010, 22:26

Thanks.
You've been very helpful.

27 Jul 2010, 22:26

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum