Micro OS contest

Index > OS Construction > Micro OS contest

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next

winner

bitshifter

[ 0 ]

windwakr

100%

[ 1 ]

Total Votes : 1

Author

Thread

mikegonta

Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 99

mikegonta 22 Jan 2009, 02:12

[ Post removed by author. ]

Last edited by mikegonta on 28 Jan 2009, 09:18; edited 1 time in total

22 Jan 2009, 02:12

Coddy41

Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 384
Location: Ohio, USA

Coddy41 22 Jan 2009, 02:13

Alright you got it geppy, Wink

And if no one submits anything, I Will Laughing

22 Jan 2009, 02:13

shoorick

Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 1614
Location: Ukraine

shoorick 22 Jan 2009, 06:34

ehhh.... where cpu is mentioned? i have only these: 8080, 8085, z80, 6800, 8086, 80286, 80386, 80486,P54,IDT-200,Celeron-300,PIV-3...
a winning OS can be written into real 2716 as a prize!

Description:
Filesize:	10.67 KB
Viewed:	7019 Time(s)

_________________
UNICODE forever!

22 Jan 2009, 06:34

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20445
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 22 Jan 2009, 06:46

shoorick wrote:

ehhh.... where cpu is mentioned?

Well if it is written for fasm the it has to be either x86 or ARM.

22 Jan 2009, 06:46

shoorick

Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 1614
Location: Ukraine

shoorick 22 Jan 2009, 06:56

Quote:

Well if it is written for fasm the it has to be either x86 or ARM

seems, you are slightly outdated Wink

http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=7787

++++++++++++++++++
that forth system is not match to the rules, as not finished and already exceeds 3kB Shocked

22 Jan 2009, 06:56

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20445
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 22 Jan 2009, 07:11

Using macros is cheating Wink

22 Jan 2009, 07:11

Coddy41

Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 384
Location: Ohio, USA

Coddy41 22 Jan 2009, 11:05

um... I don't know much on the CPU thing, so you guys figure something out Wink

I don't want to accidentally screw it up.

But to not have a rule on the cpu, might be nice?

Last edited by Coddy41 on 22 Jan 2009, 11:15; edited 1 time in total

22 Jan 2009, 11:05

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20445
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 22 Jan 2009, 11:11

Coddy41 wrote:

um i dont know mutch on the cpu thing, so you guys figure something out

So who is running this contest? It is like a chicken without a head.

22 Jan 2009, 11:11

Coddy41

Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 384
Location: Ohio, USA

Coddy41 22 Jan 2009, 11:17

... I know a little, just not a whole lot.

_________________
Want hosting for free for your asm project? You can PM me. (*.fasm4u.net)

22 Jan 2009, 11:17

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20445
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 22 Jan 2009, 11:24

Coddy41: I think that x86 would be the best choice. I am perhaps the only ARM user here and shoorick is perhaps the only 8080 user here.

22 Jan 2009, 11:24

Coddy41

Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 384
Location: Ohio, USA

Coddy41 22 Jan 2009, 11:30

um OK, I just thought of something though, we should probably make the OSes 32bit,

[off topic] im downloading windows seven beta

Last edited by Coddy41 on 22 Jan 2009, 11:35; edited 2 times in total

22 Jan 2009, 11:30

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid 22 Jan 2009, 11:30

revolution: I've done some ARM coding few years ago... but I can't call myself a "user".

22 Jan 2009, 11:30

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20445
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 22 Jan 2009, 11:43

Hehe, perhaps all those here with PDAs and/or smart phones can call themselves ARM users. Although testing a 2kB OS on one's PDA/phone could be somewhat troublesome (to say the least).

22 Jan 2009, 11:43

shoorick

Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 1614
Location: Ukraine

shoorick 22 Jan 2009, 11:55

i was real 8080 user till 2000 year, then i became a teller that i'm user Smile

22 Jan 2009, 11:55

Coddy41

Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 384
Location: Ohio, USA

Coddy41 22 Jan 2009, 12:01

Im 14 so I dont remeber the 8080, unless that is what was in my win 3.1

22 Jan 2009, 12:01

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20445
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 22 Jan 2009, 12:31

I think edfed wanted to do a PIC version with macros for fasm. I also program for the PIC occasionally, maybe it could be a PIC competition?

Hey, Coddy41, I'm just kidding, please don't take it seriously and actually try to start a PIC competition.

Coddy41: Win3.1 was for 8086 (the original x86) CPUs.

22 Jan 2009, 12:31

Coddy41

Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 384
Location: Ohio, USA

Coddy41 22 Jan 2009, 12:56

So I was kinda close, Smile

right?

Don,t worry revolution I wont start a pic contest (it took me some time to read that small print.)

22 Jan 2009, 12:56

edfed

Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 4353
Location: Now

edfed 22 Jan 2009, 17:06

i think a better contest would be an OS that fits in 64k for a 27C512 EEPROM, in order to replace the BIOS.
no?

22 Jan 2009, 17:06

tom tobias

Joined: 09 Sep 2003
Posts: 1320
Location: usa

tom tobias 22 Jan 2009, 17:24

edfed wrote:

i think a better contest would be an OS that fits in 64k for a 27C512 EEPROM, in order to replace the BIOS.

Finally, something written that makes sense.
Excellent.
At least, this contest is logical.

22 Jan 2009, 17:24

nop

Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Posts: 165
Location: right here left there

nop 23 Jan 2009, 02:57

Coddy41 wrote:

Im 14 so I dont remeber the 8080, unless that is what was in my win 3.1

are you relly only 14 years old?? wel i am too Wink

and ive never even seen win 3.1 afaik oh I get it your relly 41 like your name coddy41 says but in true intel tradition which probaly started with the 8080 you wrote your age in little endian format Smile

23 Jan 2009, 02:57

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum