Fasm.NET?

Index > Windows > Fasm.NET?

Author

Thread

fasm9

Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 439

fasm9 21 Jul 2003, 08:29

Glad all,

i know this is silly question, but is it interesting?
.NET Platform support various language

--
dotgnu, go-mono,ilasm.

21 Jul 2003, 08:29

Aquila

Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 16
Location: Russia, Moscow

Aquila 21 Jul 2003, 10:05

I think it will be much better if privalov will make support for .res and finish guide to internals. I suppose it is impossible for one man to make support for all languages, but if good documentation will be available it is possible (probably) to adapt FASM for other systems and platforms, such as .NET or (f.e.) ARM Smile

21 Jul 2003, 10:05

Tomasz Grysztar

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 8358
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar 21 Jul 2003, 11:48

And currently it's more important to implement x86-64 before .NET in fasm in my opinion.

21 Jul 2003, 11:48

scientica
Retired moderator

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 689
Location: Linköping, Sweden

scientica 21 Jul 2003, 12:58

Please don't overbloart fasm with .NET!!!!!!!!!!!! Confused

I agree with Privalov, x86-64 is much more important then .NET.

_________________
... a professor saying: "use this proprietary software to learn computer science" is the same as English professor handing you a copy of Shakespeare and saying: "use this book to learn Shakespeare without opening the book itself.
- Bradley Kuhn

21 Jul 2003, 12:58

Blag

Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 90
Location: PerÃº

Blag 21 Jul 2003, 16:04

Hi:

I'm kinda think, that Privalov is some kind of an ASM Semi-God....but come on.....he's just one.....not an army of programming willing to make everything that we ask for.....just give him a break and let him work in peace........and as Privalov and Scientica sez,

Quote:

x86-64 is much more important then .NET.

_________________
Alvaro Tejada Galindo
SinglePath games design
http://www.iespana.es/singlepath

21 Jul 2003, 16:04

fasm9

Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 439

fasm9 21 Jul 2003, 21:14

;)

--
you are right.

21 Jul 2003, 21:14

Tommy

Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Location: Norway

Tommy 24 Jul 2003, 11:52

I agree! x86-64 is much better and more necessary than .NET... Keep on the good work Privalov! Wink

I'm waiting with excitement for each of your releases!!

Take care!
Tommy

24 Jul 2003, 11:52

bazik

Joined: 28 Jul 2003
Posts: 34
Location: .de

bazik 28 Jul 2003, 13:06

I want support for my Sparc64 Very Happy

28 Jul 2003, 13:06

quiveror

Joined: 20 Jun 2003
Posts: 34

quiveror 28 Jul 2003, 17:06

Quote:

it's more important to implement x86-64 before .NET in fasm

Thanks god, that's what i've been expecting.
I always dream of using fasm to enter long mode from dos Very Happy

28 Jul 2003, 17:06

Tomasz Grysztar

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 8358
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar 28 Jul 2003, 18:05

Hello, bazik! Nice to see you here. Wink

Perhaps you'd like also Itanium support? Very Happy

28 Jul 2003, 18:05

bazik

Joined: 28 Jul 2003
Posts: 34
Location: .de

bazik 28 Jul 2003, 21:58

privalov wrote:

Hello, bazik! Nice to see you here.

Thanks! I finally found some time to register here Smile

privalov wrote:

Perhaps you'd like also Itanium support?

Hehe, that would be overkill Razz

28 Jul 2003, 21:58

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum