flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
![]() Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
Author |
|
baldr
bogdanontanu,
It's sad that you're closing that forum, but I understand your position. Holy wars are not constructive anyway. Besides, what about free-form assembler, like that: Code: u32@eax CRC32(buffer@esi, dword_count@ecx) { eax = -1; do { eax ^= [esi++]; bl = 32; do { eax >>= 1; if (CF) eax ^= 0xEDB88320; } while (--bl); } loop; eax ^= -1; } ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
bogdanontanu
Interesting "non standard" syntax
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
vid
bogdan: I think that is a bit too much emotions going in. Wouldn't it be enough to just delete HLL vs. Asm offtopic, and keep supporting the standardization, which you yourself support? I think by doing this you could badly hurt the effort.
|
|||
![]() |
|
bogdanontanu
vid wrote: bogdan: I think that is a bit too much emotions going in. Wouldn't it be enough to just delete HLL vs. Asm offtopic, and keep supporting the standardization, which you yourself support? I think by doing this you could badly hurt the effort. vid, Yes, I have thought of it and this is my new proposition I made on the MASM forums. If this is acceptable then I will re open the forums for discussions: myself wrote:
_________________ "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." |
|||
![]() |
|
vid
Come on, "if they don't agree with me, they can't talk on my website"? That's pretty totalitarian, how about some plurality of opinions and some intellectual opposition, which is nescessary for everyone to advance and to correct wrong ideas?
I agree that talks about HLLs are not needed in Asm standardization topic, and can be moderated out as offtopic (not because you don't agree with them). But future of MASM is, i think, quite important to topic and should remain. So is the realistic view on current decreasing importance of assembly, because it affects target group of proposed syntax. But anyway, I doubt Agner would participate after this. |
|||
![]() |
|
Endre
DOS386 wrote: But this won't help too far if you have C code and as long as GCC can't brew anything except AT&T gcc -S -masm=intel XYZ.c -o XYZ.s |
|||
![]() |
|
KingDemon
Quote:
You're right about that. Assembly is supposed to be fun, remember? I don't blame anyone who doesn't remember, though. You're probably pretty old. ![]() I also think Bogdan's forum should stay online if he has time to moderate it properly. Who knows? Maybe something good will come of it, but I must say I haven't visited it yet and don't intend to. Then again, I'm a noob(nobody) around here.... Cheers! |
|||
![]() |
|
DOS386
Endre wrote: gcc -S -masm=intel XYZ.c -o XYZ.s Thanks: http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=9454 |
|||
![]() |
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2 < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2020, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube, Twitter.
Website powered by rwasa.