Index
> Main > flat assembler 1.67.27Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
| Author |
|
|
revolution 21 Jul 2008, 08:37
sinsi wrote: ... fasm2c ...    |
|||
21 Jul 2008, 08:37 |
|
|
DOS386 23 Jul 2008, 02:47
sinsi wrote: Then we'll need a fasm2masm, fasm2c ... Evidence, please. What about C2FASM ? GCC still brews it's greatest AT%T only  |
|||
|
23 Jul 2008, 02:47 |
|
|
vid 23 Jul 2008, 19:07
come on people, stop with these <anything> <-> FASM ideas...
But I too wonder why tomasz keeps 1.67 minor version that hardly |
|||
|
23 Jul 2008, 19:07 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 23 Jul 2008, 19:41
vid wrote: But I too wonder why tomasz keeps 1.67 minor version that hardly I want to at least finish SSE4 support before getting to 1.68. |
|||
|
23 Jul 2008, 19:41 |
|
|
baldr 25 Jul 2008, 19:21
Perhaps \+ escape will do? Similar to continuation, + is self-descriptive (I know, I like this word
 , but line width... so goes \<NL>, eh? |
|||
|
25 Jul 2008, 19:21 |
|
|
vid 25 Jul 2008, 21:33
Quote: but useful how? |
|||
|
25 Jul 2008, 21:33 |
|
|
baldr 26 Jul 2008, 10:32
Tomasz Grysztar wrote: I have just released the new version - only bugfixes this time. Now to the gray matter: I often do start fasmw from command line, that means that fasmw store only .-relative name; the catch is when I assemble with errors (who's perfect? , it displays the very same file in another window. So the changes I accidentally (sources are so similar  did in original window are gone.
To the metal: I've used string_buffer to invoke GetFullPathname and resolve relative name to it's absolute name . The snippet following:
Code:
quoted_argument_end:
push eax edx esi
mov esi,edx
mov edi,string_buffer
rep movsb
xor al,al
stosb
invoke GetFullPathName,string_buffer,sizeof.path_buffer,path_buffer,edi
invoke GetFileTitle,path_buffer,name_buffer,sizeof.name_buffer
invoke SendMessage,[hwnd],FM_OPEN,name_buffer,path_buffer
cmp eax,-1
jne load_ok
|
|||
|
26 Jul 2008, 10:32 |
|
|
rugxulo 27 Jul 2008, 03:11
Tomasz Grysztar wrote:
SSE4a must be keeping you up at night.  |
|||
|
27 Jul 2008, 03:11 |
|
|
rugxulo 27 Jul 2008, 03:15
Tomasz Grysztar wrote:
Use Octasm (if you only need raw binary output). |
|||
|
27 Jul 2008, 03:15 |
|
for your continued dedication and commitment to the FASM project. 
I'd like to ask for a single feature request, I'd like to be able to include multiple instructions on a single line:
|
madmatt 27 Jul 2008, 07:54
[quote="rugxulo"]
Tomasz Grysztar wrote: Use Octasm (if you only need raw binary output). I'll give it a try. [EDIT] I'll just use the fasmw mod. _________________ Gimme a sledge hammer! I'LL FIX IT! |
|||
|
27 Jul 2008, 07:54 |
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2 < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|