flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Main > alpha testing - speed improvements

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
Matrix



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 1166
Location: Overflow
Matrix 08 Sep 2004, 00:28
I have tried source compiling of 1.55
and it was 4 passes 0.4 seconds 66048 bytes ( dos version )
the windows version 6 passes 0.9 seconds 104960 bytes
on my 933 Mhz ( 600Mhz Smile ) celeron

however in the windows version there are a few differences between the binaries:
a few "6E 52 3E" blocks have changed to "28 10 37"
and
a few "ED 6C 02" blocks have changed to "62 F3 01"
but not interfering much with the workigness
MATRIX
Post 08 Sep 2004, 00:28
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Madis731



Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 2139
Location: Estonia
Madis731 08 Sep 2004, 20:13
It would be a good idea to try to run EXACTLY the same sources on many
different FASMs down to some pre 1.4x when some great changes were
made in FASM.
Drawing a graph would lead us to new problems/solutions and show the
developement of <speed> so far.
Post 08 Sep 2004, 20:13
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Reply with quote
f0dder



Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 3175
Location: Denmark
f0dder 08 Sep 2004, 23:37
Matrix, isn't that just some header/PE structure data (like a timedatestamp), or perhaps uninitialized bytes?
Post 08 Sep 2004, 23:37
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Matrix



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 1166
Location: Overflow
Matrix 09 Sep 2004, 00:05
f0dder wrote:
Matrix, isn't that just some header/PE structure data (like a timedatestamp), or perhaps uninitialized bytes?

i have total commander, and file compared is hexa mode, see for yourself.

MATRIX
Post 09 Sep 2004, 00:05
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
roticv



Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 374
Location: Singapore
roticv 09 Sep 2004, 02:57
Time stamp?
Post 09 Sep 2004, 02:57
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger Reply with quote
Tomasz Grysztar



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 8351
Location: Kraków, Poland
Tomasz Grysztar 09 Sep 2004, 08:14
Yes, PE files contain the 32-bit time stamp - this value will be different each time you generate the executable.
Post 09 Sep 2004, 08:14
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Matrix



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 1166
Location: Overflow
Matrix 09 Sep 2004, 13:29
Privalov wrote:
Yes, PE files contain the 32-bit time stamp - this value will be different each time you generate the executable.


lol ,
what a feature Smile

so i can hold my data there? joy Cool

many free variables :DDD

MATRIX
Post 09 Sep 2004, 13:29
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.

Website powered by rwasa.