flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Heap > What is the best pie you can get with 9 digits?

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 27, 28, 29  Next
Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
redsock wrote:
I don't want to read all 20 pages of this thread, can someone short line the rules for me?
The rules are forever changing in this thread. The basics still apply though. Limited character set 0x20-0x7e and split into two parts; finite and transfinite.
Post 27 Feb 2015, 07:30
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
typedef



Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 2913
Location: 0x77760000
typedef
revolution wrote:
The rules are forever changing


revolution wrote:
How many more arbitrary rules will you be adding? Perhaps you can just put them all here as one set rather than adding them piecemeal.
Post 27 Feb 2015, 12:12
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
Respect the authority.
Post 27 Feb 2015, 12:17
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
typedef



Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 2913
Location: 0x77760000
typedef
revolution wrote:
Respect the authority.


Authority respected!
Post 27 Feb 2015, 12:20
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Tyler



Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 1216
Location: NC, USA
Tyler
I think the number of ordinals beats all the transfinite attempts. They can't even be contained in a set, so the number is larger than all the alephs.

So |ords|.
Post 28 Feb 2015, 04:54
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
Tyler wrote:
I think the number of ordinals beats all the transfinite attempts. They can't even be contained in a set, so the number is larger than all the alephs.

So |ords|.
I can't find any reference that uses "ords" to refer to ordinals. Linky?
Post 28 Feb 2015, 05:17
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
sid123



Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 340
Location: Asia, Singapore
sid123
Lol WTF.

Why use 9 characters when you can do it in just 3!

(1/0)
Post 28 Feb 2015, 08:16
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
Division by zero is undefined.
Post 28 Feb 2015, 08:29
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
badc0de02



Joined: 25 Nov 2013
Posts: 216
Location: %x
badc0de02
x=1/5 of the largest number possible with 9 character

x+x+x+x+x
Post 28 Feb 2015, 08:31
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
HaHaAnonymous



Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 1180
Location: Unknown
HaHaAnonymous
[ Post removed by author. ]


Last edited by HaHaAnonymous on 28 Feb 2015, 17:26; edited 1 time in total
Post 28 Feb 2015, 14:55
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
A larger one in that style is 9^9^9^9^9.
Post 28 Feb 2015, 16:47
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
HaHaAnonymous



Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 1180
Location: Unknown
HaHaAnonymous
Quote:

A larger one in that style is 9^9^9^9^9.

Quote:

What is the largest number you can write in 9 characters?

Thank you for highlighting how stupid and ignorant I am.
Post 28 Feb 2015, 17:25
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
typedef



Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 2913
Location: 0x77760000
typedef
revolution wrote:
A larger one in that style is 9^9^9^9^9.


9^9^9^9^9 = 9 Wink
Post 28 Feb 2015, 20:30
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
typedef wrote:
revolution wrote:
A larger one in that style is 9^9^9^9^9.


9^9^9^9^9 = 9 Wink
You are thinking like a programmer, not a mathematician. Razz
Post 01 Mar 2015, 01:32
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
l4m2



Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Posts: 648
l4m2
revolution wrote:
l4m2 wrote:
maxhere+9
This was already tried in a variant form by Goplat. And it was subsequently shown to be unworkable and thus disallowed.

However, you are welcome to try again.

When there is already at least an infinity number like Aleph**** it doesn't make logically inconsistent
Post 09 Dec 2015, 04:52
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
Apparently not all infinities are the same. Some are "larger" than others.
Post 09 Dec 2015, 07:39
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
l4m2



Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Posts: 648
l4m2
However adding 1 to an infinity number doesn't change it.
Is there any number larger than CountSets ?
Post 09 Dec 2015, 10:14
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
l4m2 wrote:
Is there any number larger than CountSets ?
I don't understand the question. What is "CountSets"?
Post 09 Dec 2015, 15:16
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
nkeck72



Joined: 28 May 2015
Posts: 83
Location: 0000:7C00
nkeck72
googol^9! (or something like that)
Post 09 Dec 2015, 22:35
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17278
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
nkeck72 wrote:
googol^9! (or something like that)
Googol is "only" 10^100. A single G (Graham's number) will utterly dwarf such small numbers as google^9! Razz
Post 10 Dec 2015, 01:06
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 27, 28, 29  Next

< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Copyright © 1999-2020, Tomasz Grysztar.

Powered by rwasa.