flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> Heap > Numerical oddities Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 Next 
Author 

revolution
Oddity 1:
Oddity 2:
Now with that in mind, what is (0/0)^(0/0) 

02 Mar 2008, 07:55 

Tomasz Grysztar
edfed wrote: when i say math cannot explain everithing, i don't say bullshit. When your math cannot explain everything, it's high time to rethink or redesign your math. 

02 Mar 2008, 11:08 

edfed
are you sure?
give us some examples... 

02 Mar 2008, 11:19 

Borsuc
revolution wrote: Oddity 1: I think everyone knows that infinity is a very huge value, in fact infinitely huge (and it's not a number either!). The problem when asked what is "infinity/infinity" is that it really depends on the context used. If the denominator is a "larger" infinity (it doesn't make sense, does it? but then infinity is not a number, so numbers only "tend" i.e "approach" infinity, but never 'grab' it). For example: Code: lim x/2*x x>oo Same with 0/0 > whichever happens to be 'closer to 0' in the given context will represent '0' more purely. In fact, you can even replace the above 'x>oo' with 'x>0' and you will get the exact same 1/2. If you take your time to plot this function in some CAS software, you will notice that it really does "get closer" to 1/2 when it approaches 0 (in fact it should be a constant horizontal line, at 1/2). The thing is that plots are only approximations  hence why the limit is used. The limit represents the 'value' that the approximation would converge into. So it is not right to say "what is 0/0" because it is out of context, much as 'he' would be without a subject. Also keep in mind that the standard "rules" of algebra could also be misleading  in particular think in calculus without any 'rules' to better understand it. 

02 Mar 2008, 16:55 

rugxulo
Code: 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 000000 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 

04 Mar 2008, 15:35 

edfed
an other example of infinite not very big, but existing and hard to obtain...
the charge of a capacitor via a resistor. like RC=10000 seconds R=1M C=100µF G=1V at t=0 input voltage as VE from G output voltage as VS = VC I is current in the node G,R,C J is sqrt (1) = J w is the angle, function of t. t is a constant, considered as perfectlly linear. t(t)=1*(1+t) ??? VE = 1V assume initial VS=VC=0V then, the current of circuit is the value I=(VEVS)/R and then, the voltage on C, VS, is equal to a*i*t +VS the time constant RC correspond to the time how VS will be 67% augmented from VEVS. VS(t)=VE(t)*e (rc) then lim VS/VE t >oo = 1V then as 1 is the image of infinity, the infinity is equal to 1 VS will strictlly never be equal to VE, even in case of perfect resistors, capacitors, generators and wires. please correct the big english errors i write. that make this post hard to read and understand. 

04 Mar 2008, 23:31 

bitRAKE
revolution wrote: Oddity 1: 0/number * number/0 = 0/0 * number/number = 0/0 My zero is bigger than your zero! (I don't know if that is a good thing™ or not, lol.) 

05 Mar 2008, 03:07 

Borsuc
rugxulo wrote:
why I like it is that you "need" to understand this stuff, not just follow some rules (as in algebra) 

05 Mar 2008, 15:30 

revolution
Oddity 3:


06 Mar 2008, 17:45 

edfed
∞/∞ = 1
because ∞ = ∞ revolution: thanks for the ∞ char, now, i think about, can somebody post a message with a lot of symbols, then, llink it via "interresting topics", then, we'll have a symbol bank accessible for all users...because i don't feel to learn them or make it by myself... hehe 

06 Mar 2008, 18:51 

revolution
edfed: Do you have "Character map" on your windows machine?
Start/Programs/Accessories/System Tools/Character Map 

06 Mar 2008, 18:58 

edfed
no i don't have installed this, and my cd is crashed... some parts are impossible to read. like char map.
and i cannot scandisk my first partition, don't know why, and it suxxx. 

07 Mar 2008, 01:46 

revolution
edfed wrote: ∞/∞ = 1 Okay, let's follow this through, 1. ∞/∞ = 1, and 2. ∞+∞ = ∞, gives 3. (∞+∞)/∞ = 1 4. ∞/∞+∞/∞ = 1 5. 1+1 = 1 6. 2 = 1 Just for edfed: ¢£¥§©®²³µ₣₤ⁿ€Ω→√∞≈≠∑° 

07 Mar 2008, 05:50 

Borsuc
The reciprocal of x, defined as r(x) is:
r(x) = 1/x Applying it twice we arrive at the original 'x'. r(r(x)) = x Now suppose x is 0. r(x) should be undefined, but applying r(r(x)) we should arrive at the original x, therefore: r(r(0)) = 0 So then, who's reciprocal equals 0? 1/∞ = 0 like you said. r(∞) = 0 r(r(x)) = 0 conclusion > r(x) = ∞ Therefore: 1/0 = ∞ this was done to further show that +0 and 0 are defined (because of no ambiguity at ∞ and +∞). 

08 Mar 2008, 13:07 

MHajduk
Symbols +0 and 0 are defined and equal to 0 (in real numbers set).


08 Mar 2008, 13:16 

Borsuc
'equal' to 0 as in their absolute values (because they are too small to be measured by their 'signed' values).
But their reciprocals are different 

08 Mar 2008, 13:29 

revolution
The_Grey_Beast wrote: 'equal' to 0 as in their absolute values (because they are too small to be measured by their 'signed' values). Last edited by revolution on 08 Mar 2008, 14:18; edited 1 time in total 

08 Mar 2008, 14:03 

Borsuc
Ok, I think I didn't use the right words (and wasn't talking about 'absolute' as in the abs function, doh I forgot about it, sorry).
+0 and 0 are the same (well, too close to even count in normal computations) on almost every operation, except that they have different reciprocals. But by definition: 0 < +0 0 = +0 

08 Mar 2008, 14:06 

TmX
Let's review a basic rule : (x^a)/(x^b) = x^(ab)
So, 0^0 is actualy (0^0)/(0^0), since 0 = 0  0 . Whaaait a minute .... 

09 Mar 2008, 09:13 

Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 Next < Last Thread  Next Thread > 
Forum Rules:

Copyright © 19992020, Tomasz Grysztar.
Powered by rwasa.