flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
![]() |
Author |
|
penang 07 May 2008, 01:46
Hmmm.... go for it?
|
|||
![]() |
|
vid 07 May 2008, 06:29
Quote: Built-in call for Vortex's scan tool (it gets boring to create the import section by hand) ermmm... how often do you start new project? |
|||
![]() |
|
okasvi 13 Jul 2008, 17:31
Not an bad idea, comrade has gone pretty far already, and I've started to add on that.
So far I've added Predefinitions to fasmw, but it's somewhat incomplete, supports only one predefinition atm. + dialog could look better. I've planned to add another another edit-field for debug-predef which could be set quickly from ie. the same menu as Assing to compiler to choose between debug and release builds(useful for debug-macros atleast), will add kb shortcut too. I used Tomasz's own convert_definition_option from win32 fasm.asm ![]()
_________________ When We Ride On Our Enemies support reverse smileys |: |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
comrade 13 Jul 2008, 17:39
Great initiative, okasvi.
If you guys want to make this serious, lets register a SourceForge project and take advantage of free SVN hosting they provide. |
|||
![]() |
|
f0dder 13 Jul 2008, 19:47
Since Tomasz doesn't feel too much like accepting other people's contributions to the FASM sourcebase, and since some features (like code completion) are relatively "heavy", I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a better idea to use (or create?) another editor, instead of branching FASMW and having all the bother of keeping the projects in sync?
|
|||
![]() |
|
okasvi 13 Jul 2008, 21:09
I'm not after codecompletion atleast.
|
|||
![]() |
|
comrade 14 Jul 2008, 03:22
f0dder wrote: Since Tomasz doesn't feel too much like accepting other people's contributions to the FASM sourcebase, and since some features (like code completion) are relatively "heavy", I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a better idea to use (or create?) another editor, instead of branching FASMW and having all the bother of keeping the projects in sync? What about Fresh? |
|||
![]() |
|
bitRAKE 14 Jul 2008, 04:27
I've switched back to RadASM about six months ago - still configuring to get the most out of it. It has code completion, but doesn't match my coding style when it comes to navigation. Having something which understands FASM better would be a great benefit.
|
|||
![]() |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2025, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.