flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Windows > fasm windows installer


is this useful?
yes
33%
 33%  [ 3 ]
no
66%
 66%  [ 6 ]
Total Votes : 9

Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
jaked122



Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 1
jaked122 13 Jan 2008, 16:59
I wave crated an installer that has helped me even on windows vista Very Happy Very Happy if nobody else likes it than i made it for myself anyway
Post 13 Jan 2008, 16:59
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
LocoDelAssembly
Your code has a bug


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 4624
Location: Argentina
LocoDelAssembly 13 Jan 2008, 17:39
And where is it?
Post 13 Jan 2008, 17:39
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vov4ik



Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 28
Location: USSR, Moscow Region
Vov4ik 13 Jan 2008, 18:10
I don't like installers if they add something to registry (i don't like registry too) Wink That programs don't work after reinstalling windows or moving it into another directory. An alternative way is using SFX archives, but they are executable, so it may cause problems with viruses/antiviruses. That's why my choice is archives. Wink
Post 13 Jan 2008, 18:10
View user's profile Send private message ICQ Number Reply with quote
Madis731



Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 2139
Location: Estonia
Madis731 13 Jan 2008, 19:20
I like installers because they do all the hard work that usually means writing to the registry.
I dislike installers because they usually don't uninstall what they've just installed. I'd like to tell uninstallers that:
1) Shift-DEL this crap;
2) Shift-DEL additional files created while this program was installed;
3) Don't just Shift-DEL all the files, but the directory U resided in aswell!!!.

And that is when I like an installer Very Happy

Does your installer make icon associations and can (will be able) remove these after installation? I'm a visually thinking person and I have different icons for *.inc and *.asm files.
Post 13 Jan 2008, 19:20
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Reply with quote
AlexP



Joined: 14 Nov 2007
Posts: 561
Location: Out the window. Yes, that one.
AlexP 14 Jan 2008, 01:09
I think any installer that does anything more than unpack and drop the files in a SINGLE directory, none of that 251 folders with uncomprehensible names tree thingy like IE, or any installer that even touches the registry or anything else should be shot in the kneecaps and left to bleed out and die... I did see an interesting idea from trojan viruses, on "self-destruct" mode they would create a batch file and then terminate. this batch file would delete all the files that were created with the program, anything else that it has modified on the computer, and then delete itself (yeah!!) so there is no trace left... Here's the code for a batch file that uninstalls a program like this:

Code:
@echo off
:start
if no exist "C:\Program Files\ProgramName\???.exe" goto done
del "C:\Program Files\ProgramName\???.exe"
goto start
:done
del uninstall.bat
    

I have tested this code and it works!! I think any windows installer should have a simple batch file like this to uninstall itself, considering the windows registry can be accessed and modified by the command line (reg.exe, ect..)(google it). Great idea for anyone actually going to use it!


Last edited by AlexP on 14 Jan 2008, 01:17; edited 1 time in total
Post 14 Jan 2008, 01:09
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
System86



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 77
System86 14 Jan 2008, 01:13
Quote:

Here's the code for a program (single .exe) that utilizes a batch file like this:


That's the code for the batch file (.bat file), not an exe.
Post 14 Jan 2008, 01:13
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AlexP



Joined: 14 Nov 2007
Posts: 561
Location: Out the window. Yes, that one.
AlexP 14 Jan 2008, 01:15
sry, noticed that Smile.
Post 14 Jan 2008, 01:15
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
bitRAKE



Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 4078
Location: vpcmpistri
bitRAKE 14 Jan 2008, 05:12
I can unpack to a folder, and never should installation require more!

[RANT]File associations and all that other crap should be an option from within the software. I hate the "branding" that marketing departments like to do, and I don't want your fucking company logo all over my machine! I avoid any company that installs their software like they own my machine.

I can understand some users need "hand-holding" to setup all these "nice features", but run a wizard on first execution that I can cancel/abort. And have an option to undo all these things. Use an INI file so I can use multiple installations and/or across network drives and still have my settings.[/RANT]

Maybe I should go back to DOS. Confused
Post 14 Jan 2008, 05:12
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
OzzY



Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 1029
Location: Everywhere
OzzY 14 Jan 2008, 23:40
bitRAKE wrote:
I can unpack to a folder, and never should installation require more!

[RANT]File associations and all that other crap should be an option from within the software. I hate the "branding" that marketing departments like to do, and I don't want your fucking company logo all over my machine! I avoid any company that installs their software like they own my machine.

I can understand some users need "hand-holding" to setup all these "nice features", but run a wizard on first execution that I can cancel/abort. And have an option to undo all these things. Use an INI file so I can use multiple installations and/or across network drives and still have my settings.[/RANT]

Maybe I should go back to DOS. Confused


Maybe we should create a new DOS with GUI. Very Happy
Post 14 Jan 2008, 23:40
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Madis731



Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 2139
Location: Estonia
Madis731 15 Jan 2008, 06:58
It was jaked122's first & last post. Does everybody still think that he's got an installer written?
Post 15 Jan 2008, 06:58
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Reply with quote
bitRAKE



Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 4078
Location: vpcmpistri
bitRAKE 15 Jan 2008, 15:38
Maybe, jaked122 was asking to see if other people would like an installer.
Post 15 Jan 2008, 15:38
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
OzzY



Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 1029
Location: Everywhere
OzzY 15 Jan 2008, 17:55
I'd like a installer that downloads latest FASM version and installs it.
I was creating something like this, but lack of time sucks.
I'll probably restart this project now.
Post 15 Jan 2008, 17:55
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  


< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Copyright © 1999-2025, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.

Website powered by rwasa.