i typed "fasm manual export" on google, 0 results.
So, how can i export functions manualy?

I think you're looking for the 'public' keyword.

Nah, I think he wants to build an export section manually.

I can't recall the format:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/03/PE2/

bump, need example

Well, there is a macro for this. So, how hard could it be to reverse engineer. Much easier than reading a bunch of documentation: This code replaces the export section of the DLL example program of the standard distribution. The macro sorts ordinals and name RVA's based on function strings.

That should be enough to get you coding!

shouldnt be after
I might be wrong, but it would by logical that export work 0-terminated like import.

and for what is

No. Check the documentation. It is the name of the DLL.

I tryed to find it, but in that link http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/03/PE2/ thers nothing!
Google also give me 'excel exports' and other shit. maybe im using wrong queries...


So if i write there kernel32.dll, ill spoof kernel32? yes?

Search for PE or portable executable or something like that when looking for PE exports. No, I think the name is ignored by Windows so feel free to put whatever you want there.

I've heard that you "can lead a horse to water, but can't make him drink." But if I horse told you he was thirsty you'd think he'd at least try the fucking water!

You can lead a horse to water, but can't make him think.

i wont gona learn it, if you spam with google and search.
I cant belive you dont know such basic things. You code under windows, so that should be easy for you. Ohh, im sorry, you use macros. When i know something, and someone ask for it, i never google him, i always try to make him understand untill he say 'ok now i understand, thread can be closed'.
For long time i didnt needed export, untill now. I searched for this topic, and once more tried to understand this.

says me nothing
why 0 and 1? WHY? I dont know.



WHY ITS THER IF LOADER IGNORE IT?
Its not ignoring it, so why it works without it? Yea, ask fu **in google =/

Maybe you dont understand me, ok:
my point is to understand how it work, not how to use it. If i would like to write working applications in short time would propably go in c#.

I NEVER ask questions, without googling for answer. Documentation of api is easy to find, and such basic things. But what to do, if sometimes first result is my topic on forum =/ Damn, even if i find something, its written to someone who already know it. Not even 1 example (dd 0,0,0,0,0 -1st is directory table, this is used for..., 2nd is adress table, and so on... ) Im not talking only about pe export, i stuck on many things. Manuals are written for experts! Even for more trivial things, like simple api calls or delphi/c/php syntax (ohh, i just love those php scripts, magic_quotes for some ppl are really magic). On other forum many have this problem. Why? Because their are dumb? No, cuz thers no good source. When i started with programming (php>c) i was total noob, and thought that compiler is that gui program. And didnt even knew how it translate code, ssembler was for me a language like c or c++ but extremly-hard from ppl who write super-programs in 15 minutes or heared from sm1 else. Why? No good source. Howewer i discovered the truth. But now its same thing, no answers>questions>google>no answers>bump>google - infinite loop.
Maybe after spamming 20 forums finally i get answer, this worked before. Or maybe i waste more time searching, asking, and coding shitty programs cuz of low knowleadge. But imho its better to write crap in fasm, than try to find how to add 2 strings in c (lol, i never forget it, i was searching for it few months! Why? Because i didnt know whats memory, and how its stored there). Thats why im trying to understand, then to code. (main reason why i like fasm so much, no usless crap, if i fu*k something program will crash, and i learn whats wrong) In c u understand nothing, null, nil, zero, \x00. Only knowleadge is how to include, loop and use high-level function. If something is wrong, compiler will correct if, thats programming? Thats joke. Why it add tons of usless code? Why simple hello worlsd must have 15 kb? Maybe its good for now, but there should be better language. No optimizations, everything work as it should, loop has always same base. Im even thinking of making such thing, but i need to learn much yet, or it would be another crap, even worst than delphi. I finally resigned from c, when it came to make socket program (dns resolve). It was hardcore for me in c. Then i tried in MASM, same effect. When i learned more, i understood thers no dword, and size_t, but 4 byte argument wich can be adress or direct value (still having problems with '**var'). Microsoft used logic creating their system, c-creators used money and hmm, cant even express it. And some people belive its impossible to learn programming seeing a fuc**ng unsigned const __fastcall crap (*SIZE_STRUCT_PTR)&(*some_func(&(**DWORD_PTR(__something(**inet_ntoa(**var.at_ss_ip[&var3.addr])))))) wich a simple call to inet_ntoa... Even today i was wondering whats wrong with my prog, ofc bad thing from c, i used label like variable -.-. Why? No good source.
I wrote so much, you dont have to read it. Im just tired of searching and finding only my own questions and other shit, i had to say it.

http://win32assembly.online.fr/tutorials.html <- PE Tutorials
http://win32assembly.online.fr/pe-tut7.html <- PE Tutorials - Export Table
http://www.google.com/search?hl=es&q=PE+export+table&meta= (And first result is the tutorial above)

Read the whole tutorial and ask questions about it, I think it tells all you need (or must be supplemented a few with the already provided links).

ill try (again...) to compare this manual to example from this thread. Maybe i understand it now.

But that example made me laugh, its a joke, right? Respect for this who understand it.

edit:

right, at begining ther refering to that dam example


thats something.
...but i cant find any 11 dwords in bitRAKE's example.


okay, dw 0, dw 1. Each function must have next ordinal (65025 max?)


only? import cant do that?

hmm...

=

?


ok, i wrote this:

dont work =/

Where are the ordinals in your example? ...and where do you point to them with an address? Did you try to assemble the example I took the time to create instead of just saying it didn't work?

If you need a complete program then just replace the text in the DLL example that comes with FASM with the code I posted. What?...You want me to write you a complete tutorial on exports? Sorry, but I don't know anything - I just reverse engineered the macro that comes with FASM. I don't know the "why it is the way it is." I just know the example I posted works.

bump


and u simply call it by ordinals (1,2,3,...)