flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
![]() |
Author |
|
SoLo2 27 Aug 2007, 03:47
I was trying to assemble
with fasm, but the DOSBox would ask for some memory extensor. So I found in a wiki a link to CWSDPMI which has to be called every time before fasm. Is there a possibility of having fasm in 16 bits? Is it all 32bits code? Thanks for this nice ass! SoLo2 _________________ ~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://thebitsclub.tripod.com/ http://so_o2.tripod.com/delfin.html http://so_o2.tripod.com/xmus.html http://www.geocities.com/mud_gallery/index.html |
|||
![]() |
|
DOS386 27 Aug 2007, 04:36
> I was trying to assemble
> with fasm, but the DOSBox > would ask for some > memory extensor. Why don't you use the Win32 version if you must run it on Vi$ta ? ![]() > So I found in a wiki a link to CWSDPMI > which has to be called every time before fasm. Yes. Works. But CWSDPMI is obsolete, HDPMI32 is much better (for DOS). > Is there a possibility of > having fasm in 16 bits? [NO] ![]() > Is it all 32bits code? YES. Would be extremely difficult to port to 16-bit. And, you would have "out of memory" problems then ![]() What is your CPU ? P4 ? AMD64 ? And with such you ask for 16-bit ? ![]() BTW: NASM has a 16-bit RM version ... untested by me ![]() Last edited by DOS386 on 27 Aug 2007, 21:16; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
Tomasz Grysztar 27 Aug 2007, 09:32
Versions <=1.48 had a 16-bit FRM version for DOS, but it was no longer supported later.
It may still be possible to re-assembler fasm into 16-bit MZ (as it would no longer fit into .com), thought it would require a bit of work. I suggest that you visit http://fasm.sourceforge.net/archive/ and grab the 1.48 package to try the FASM.COM version (it's in SOURCE/DOS subdirectory). |
|||
![]() |
|
DOS386 27 Aug 2007, 21:20
Quote: Versions <=1.48 had a 16-bit FRM version for DOS, but it was no longer supported later. FRM = Unreal mode with 16-bit CS (and all 32-bit stuff prefixed ?) ? Later used 32-bit Unreal mode ? The memory management of FASM is and always was somewhat black magic ![]() http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=472 bttr complained about FASM preferring Unreal from DPMI ... and it hasn't been fixed up to now. The issue is not critical for me, but I still stink that DPMI should be preferred from Unreal ... FASM still doesn't work if it finds CPU in real mode and DPMI present ![]() BTW, FASMD seems to no longer use Unreal ... only DPMI ... so it doesn't suffer from bttr's "DPMI bug" ![]() Code: ; flat assembler version 1.0 ; Copyright (c) 1999-2000, Tomasz Grysztar ; All rights reserved. init_flatrm: push sp ; store stack frame pop ax cmp ax,sp ; compare stack frame values jne processor_error ; if not equal, CPU is 8086-80186 !!! BUG !!! SORRY but I have to report a BUG in FASM 1.0 (better late than never ![]() ![]() ![]() No need for a 8086_only directive ? ![]() 16-bit CPUID'ding discussed also here: http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=7204 The archive is definitely interesting : Code: version 1.02 [06-07-2000] ------------ [-] minor bugs fixed [+] some documentation changes version 1.01 [01-07-2000] ------------ [-] fixed bug in MZ header generator version 1.00 [19-06-2000] ------------ [+] first official release version 0.90 [04-05-1999] ------------ [+] first version able to recompile itself version 0.00 [23-03-1999] ------------ [+] flat assembler project was started at 14:24:33 - Project start known with precision of seconds ![]() - 1.00 Needed 21 days from compile to release ![]() - 1.00 Seems to have very exclusively supported pure real mode DOS only ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2025, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.