Index
> Main > fasm why not update?Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
| Author |
|
|
vid 02 Aug 2007, 10:11
that's a very gross solution...
 |
|||
02 Aug 2007, 10:11 |
|
|
Niels 02 Aug 2007, 15:24
It seems that some want the preprocessor to be C and missed the thirty years existence of "ASM {}" in C.
Niels |
|||
|
02 Aug 2007, 15:24 |
|
|
MichaelH 02 Aug 2007, 22:26
vid wrote:
Vid you are talking complete nonsense. I expect your post to be split off into another thread
Quote:
Sigh 
Quote:
Ummmmm ..... I have a question. I'm on windows at the moment and I always see 1000's of files with a .dll as there extension. Can you please explain what these file are for? Thanks in advance. |
|||
|
02 Aug 2007, 22:26 |
|
|
vid 02 Aug 2007, 23:16
Quote:
You don't agree that FASM does extremely good job for FASM-only projects? 
I will split after i try to mock someone by falsely quoting him 
Quote: Ummmmm ..... I have a question. I'm on windows at the moment and I always see 1000's of files with a .dll as there extension. Can you please explain what these file are for? Thanks in advance. I quess each of them has different purpose
Now you tell me: how is DLL better than static linking, in case only one process is going to use it? It has considerably more overhead, it's slower, you need more files, you risk conflicts, it takes more executable files, etc.. etc... Should I resort to worser way of doing something just because i am too lazy to learn better way? |
|||
|
02 Aug 2007, 23:16 |
|
|
Niels 03 Aug 2007, 10:28
vid wrote: Should I resort to worser way of doing something just because i am too lazy to learn better way? I am mostly waiting on the answer from Tomasz, but you keep me laughing Vid, big time! Niels |
|||
|
03 Aug 2007, 10:28 |
|
|
f0dder 03 Aug 2007, 23:25
Arrogance and ignorance go hand in hand.
|
|||
|
03 Aug 2007, 23:25 |
|
|
MichaelH 04 Aug 2007, 00:26
vid wrote:
Well, at least you're honest
Isn't this quoting out of context fun
I might do it again - f0dder, I'm not so sure vid deserves to be called arrogant and ignorant. I admit that some of the things he is saying are based on a lack of knowledge but arrogant and ignorant is way to harsh |
|||
|
04 Aug 2007, 00:26 |
|
|
vid 04 Aug 2007, 10:42
MichaelH: nice demonstration of mis-quoting, unlike Niels's lame falsifying. :]
|
|||
|
04 Aug 2007, 10:42 |
|
|
Niels 04 Aug 2007, 14:28
vid wrote: MichaelH: nice demonstration of mis-quoting, unlike Niels's lame falsifying. :] vid, if you loose the hate, most of the shite might melt on a cleary day, why people like it in their eyes so much I don't understand. Niels |
|||
|
04 Aug 2007, 14:28 |
|
|
Niels 04 Aug 2007, 15:14
f0dder wrote: Arrogance and ignorance go hand in hand. When a father teaches his child to ignore another child based on straight and righteous rules that's love, when a child is old enough you can teach him to straighten out and make right other children, that too is love. As you see there is no arrogance is my setup, nor do I act by carelessness, hate and aggression. I am a pacifist; Even when I have to slap a man to wake him or kill him to give life. Niels |
|||
|
04 Aug 2007, 15:14 |
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2 < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|