flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Main > GUI design thoughts and ideas for you

Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17664
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution
Some interesting insights from Joel Spolsky regarding user interface design. This addresses the common design issue of product which emphasizes too much on technical details rather than usability. Usability refers to how efficient and easy a product that can be used by a user to solve problem, not necessarily stunning visual effects or rocket science features. Google products such as Google Search, Gmail and Gtalk are great examples of high usability: Light-weight, simple, clean, easy to use yet problem solving.

http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000057.html
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000058.html
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000059.html
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000060.html
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000061.html
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000062.html
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000063.html
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000064.html
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000065.html


Joel Spolsky:

When you design user interfaces, it's a good idea to keep two principles in mind:

1.. Users don't have the manual, and if they did, they wouldn't read it.
2.. In fact, users can't read anything, and if they could, they wouldn't want to.
Post 18 Jun 2007, 11:45
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
r22



Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 805
r22
Good thread, most ASM programmers tend to avoid GUI because it's time consuming and there's no algorithms to optimize. But GUI design is very important when creating software for OTHERs to use.

The tendency to over simplify GUIs just to get them done and functional isn't always a bad thing. I simple dialog with buttons for every program action is pretty straight forward and easy to use when you compare it to a tree of confusing menus to navigate. The buttons are simpler/ more efficient to use but you sacrifice screen realistate.

Customization:
I think as broadband and always on connections become more common, application customization will also resurface. If you develope software with registration (serial/key etc) why not allow the user to save their customization settings on your server. When they jump onto another computer with that software they simply type their email and password, and those saved settings are initialized for them.

This is present (and i think more so in the future) with web 2.0 applications using AJAX and DB.

3D GUIs:
I don't if an intuitive and efficient way to use 3D in a GUI will come about, but their a few benefits to graphics accelerated GUIs that are present now. Transparency in windows and toolbards is great especially in a program with a lot of need options. Also being able to embed video; if a user needs help with an option they just right click and hit help and a video tutorial for it runs right in the main window.

MOV rax,Long[RANT]
RET 0
Post 18 Jun 2007, 16:36
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  


< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Copyright © 1999-2020, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube, Twitter.

Website powered by rwasa.