Index
> Main > which debugger? |
| Author |
|
|
thecf 23 Dec 2006, 04:08
which is the best debugger for my fasm win32 projects?
|
|||
23 Dec 2006, 04:08 |
|
|
Filter 23 Dec 2006, 04:26
http://www.ollydbg.de/ -> seems to work well for me
There might be something better out there and I'm sure other forum members will chime in. I'm a newbie to FASM so the other forum members will probably have better advice. |
|||
|
23 Dec 2006, 04:26 |
|
|
coconut 23 Dec 2006, 04:28
ollydbg and softice are probly the most popular debuggers. olly is free, while softice is not and i believe it is no longer available for sale. microsoft also has their own product, windbg, which i find too awkward to use
http://www.ollydbg.de/ http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.mspx |
|||
|
23 Dec 2006, 04:28 |
|
|
zhak 23 Dec 2006, 17:58
Numega SoftIce 4.2.7 NT/2000/XP RC1 can be downloaded from http://reversing.kulichki.net/files/debug/sinstallnt.exe. It was ripped from Driver Studio
|
|||
|
23 Dec 2006, 17:58 |
|
|
coconut 23 Dec 2006, 18:31
zhak, dont post 'warez' here please
|
|||
|
23 Dec 2006, 18:31 |
|
|
rugxulo 23 Dec 2006, 19:03
|
|||
|
23 Dec 2006, 19:03 |
|
|
zhak 23 Dec 2006, 20:12
coconut, sorry. I won't...
|
|||
|
23 Dec 2006, 20:12 |
|
|
RedGhost 23 Dec 2006, 21:55
From my experience Olly is the safest and easiest to use.
_________________ redghost.ca |
|||
|
23 Dec 2006, 21:55 |
|
|
f0dder 24 Dec 2006, 21:04
If you're going to use softice, do yourself a favour and install it on a separate machine (or dual-boot config) running win2k SP4, and PS/2 keyboard/mouse.
Getting softice working on XP, especially if you have things like dualcore, lots of ram, and USB mouse (or even worse, keyboard!) can be really hellish - and even when it seems to work perfectly, you risk getting a sudden reboot after some hours of work. It's a real shame softice was discontinued, as it was a really powerful debugging tool, and a lot more intuitive than WinDBG. WinDBG is also pretty powerful, though - but you need two machines to do kernel-mode debugging (and the control is horribly slow unless you use a firewire connection between the two). You can also do vmware with serial emulation via named pipes, but that's also pretty slow. And then there's the issue of WinDBG having an extremely clunky interface  |
|||
|
24 Dec 2006, 21:04 |
|
|
MCD 26 Dec 2006, 10:37
anyone has an idea for a good Linux debugger like OllyDbg? I think I will start a new thread for that
|
|||
|
26 Dec 2006, 10:37 |
|
|
TmX 26 Dec 2006, 11:22
what about GDB ?
|
|||
|
26 Dec 2006, 11:22 |
|
|
hckr83 26 Dec 2006, 15:21
as for the problem with serial stuff...
http://sourceforge.net/projects/com0com allows for virtual serial ports under windows which you can then use in bochs or vpc or whatever...(it's a bit hard to setup though) |
|||
|
26 Dec 2006, 15:21 |
|
|
ACP 26 Dec 2006, 20:12
SoftICE was the best debugger for Windows ring 0 code. OllyDBG and IDAPRo build in debuggers are very powerful but can debug only ring 3 applications, while IDA is capable of disassembling device drivers and can be run remotely on Windows and Linux systems. IDAPRo is commercial product and it's worths its price however I prefer debugging with OllyDBG. Visual Studio also has not a bad (but certainly not the best) debugger.
|
|||
|
26 Dec 2006, 20:12 |
|
|
f0dder 26 Dec 2006, 23:19
ACP wrote:
Depends on what you're doing, though - if you're debugging something you have the source for, and especially one of the supported HLLs, the VS debugger is very very nifty, because of things like watch expressions, type knowledge, etc... |
|||
|
26 Dec 2006, 23:19 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|