Is it possible to insert code from later in the file?

Index > Main > Is it possible to insert code from later in the file?

Author

Thread

Plue

Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 151

Plue

Is it possible to trick fasm into doing something like this?

Code:


<insert SymbolName here>

Macro SymbolName {
   Simple list of instructions
   ..
}

_________________
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Some poems rhyme
And some don't.

29 Nov 2006, 14:51

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid

unfortunatelly, no.

only with some very dirty tricks, and i am not sure about it.

29 Nov 2006, 15:33

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17667
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

Macros cannot be forward referenced, not ever, never, no chance, not possible. Except if you rewrite fasm.

29 Nov 2006, 17:47

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid

but you can store data in variables and forward reference variables... that's what i meant with "very dirty tricks"

29 Nov 2006, 18:00

Tomasz Grysztar

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 7797
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar

This "dirty trick" is closely related to this problem: http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=5934

29 Nov 2006, 18:28

Plue

Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 151

Plue

revolution wrote:

Macros cannot be forward referenced, not ever, never, no chance, not possible. Except if you rewrite fasm.

As I said, I don't need full macro functionality, only a simple list of instructions.

It looks like what I want to do is actually possible by forward-referencing a variable from a macro and then generating the instructions from that macro. But I managed to do it some other way by buffering up all the code in between, writing the simple list of instructions without going through the buffer, and then writing the buffer. (I am writing a compiler.)

_________________
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Some poems rhyme
And some don't.

29 Nov 2006, 19:17

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17667
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

Plue wrote:

As I said, I don't need full macro functionality, only a simple list of instructions.

Where did you say that?

Plue wrote:

I am writing a compiler.

Do you have a website where we can see your compiler?

29 Nov 2006, 20:39

Plue

Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 151

Plue

revolution wrote:

Plue wrote:
As I said, I don't need full macro functionality, only a simple list of instructions.
Where did you say that?

Ok, maybe I didn't say it very clearly, but:

Macro SymbolName {
Simple list of instructions < Here!!! Wink

..
}

Quote:

Plue wrote:
I am writing a compiler.
Do you have a website where we can see your compiler?

Yup! http://lasic.frac.dk/forum/

_________________
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Some poems rhyme
And some don't.

29 Nov 2006, 21:44

Goplat

Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 181

Goplat

revolution wrote:

Macros cannot be forward referenced, not ever, never, no chance, not possible.

Sounds like a challenge Wink

Call this file fwdmac.asm

Code:

match =1,second {
        mymacro
}

match =second,second {
        macro mymacro \{
                db "blah"
        \}

        second equ 1
        include 'fwdmac.asm'
}

30 Nov 2006, 00:41

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid

Goplat:

good one....

30 Nov 2006, 08:03

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17667
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

Goplat wrote:

Sounds like a challenge

I like it. Now that is really thinking outside the box.

Okay, I change my statement a little. How about this:

Macros cannot be forward referenced in a useful way, not ever, never, no chance, not possible.

Hehe, now the challenge is to make it useful ... Wink

30 Nov 2006, 11:16

Mr_Silent

Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 30

Mr_Silent

2 revolution: What is your meaning of "useful"?

Code:

.maincode fix _main
macro _main
 {
  macro tag_main {
 }
;------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.postdef fix } _post
macro _post
 {
  macro tag_post {
 }
;------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.end fix } _end
macro _end
 {
  tag_post
  tag_main
 }
;//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

.maincode
 zb sb1,'a','b','z','x'
 zd sd1,'a','b','z','x'

.postdef

 macro zd p1,[p2]
  \{
   \common
   label p1
   \forward
   dd p2
   \common dd 0
  \}

 macro zb p1,[p2]
  \{
   \common
   label p1
   \forward
   db p2
   \common db 0
  \}

.end

30 Nov 2006, 15:44

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17667
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

Mr_Silent: I think your code does not address the problem of defining the macros after you instantiate it. You code defines a few macros but does not use any of them until the final ".end" statement.

Goplat posted a nice example of reassembling the same file again that simulates defining macros after they are used, but I think it is not useful in any real program. It was all in good fun and my challenge was not anything serious. I would be delighted to see a real-world working example of Goplat's idea given above.

30 Nov 2006, 22:45

Mr_Silent

Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 30

Mr_Silent

revolution wrote:

I think your code does not address the problem of defining the macros after you instantiate it.

Of course, it doesn't Very Happy

. There is no such problem, Exclamation

because strait fwd-ref is impossible (with current implementation of Fasm preprocessor) Exclamation

, point. The only matter could be discussed here is how to "trick fasm into doing something like..." (see post 1).
Idea

Or did you want the community to find some critical bu... err... feature which will allow normal fwd-ref Question

01 Dec 2006, 06:40

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 17667
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

Mr_Silent wrote:

Or did you want the community to find some critical bu... err... feature which will allow normal fwd-ref

Yep, I would like to see someone find a "feature". Feature finding is a hobby of mine. Wink

01 Dec 2006, 12:31

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum