Index
> Main > Best x86 Assembler (excluding FASM)Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
| Best x86 Assembler | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Votes : 55 |
| Author |
|
|
a16b03
rugxulo wrote: A386/D386 are okay (fast, small, powerful, good docs) And I like A86/A386 syntax + D86/D386. |
|||
02 Dec 2006, 13:42 |
|
|
MCD
I just can't believe there are so many votes for TASM, all different versions I got where very limited in functions and/or full of newbie bugs. I just don't want to tell what stupid bugs some kind of version my last TASM had
 _________________ MCD - the inevitable return of the Mad Computer Doggy -||__/ .|+-~ .|| || |
|||
|
28 Dec 2006, 16:06 |
|
|
dazzit
My question on this is what about actual compilation speed.
something like Yasm is designed to be multi platform, multi processor and thusly has generalisations rather than optimisations to accomodate this. I'm thinking it the general direction of a project involving reflective programming maybe an operating system of some kind and quite frankly I haven't seen anything as fast and as flexible as flatassembler so far. |
|||
|
11 Jan 2007, 11:30 |
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2 < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|