flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Main > Best x86 Assembler (excluding FASM)

Goto page Previous  1, 2

Best x86 Assembler
NASM
21%
 21%  [ 12 ]
YASM
7%
 7%  [ 4 ]
Lazy (LZASM)
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
NewBasic (NBASM32)
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
HLA
5%
 5%  [ 3 ]
MASM
21%
 21%  [ 12 ]
POASM
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
RosASM
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
TASM
23%
 23%  [ 13 ]
OPTASM
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
TMA
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
A86/A386
3%
 3%  [ 2 ]
GAS (GNU)
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
Octasm
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
GoASM
5%
 5%  [ 3 ]
Arrowsoft
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Wolfware (WASM.COM)
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
OpenWatcom (WASM.EXE)
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Pass32
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
can't decide, there are too many good ones!
7%
 7%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 55

Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
a16b03



Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 43
Location: Riga, Latvia
a16b03
rugxulo wrote:
A386/D386 are okay (fast, small, powerful, good docs)


And I like A86/A386 syntax + D86/D386.
Post 02 Dec 2006, 13:42
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
flash



Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 55
Location: Cuba
flash
I discover de assembly languaje by means of TASM. After, I pass to MASM. But I found, casually, FASM and I have no other options. I do not understand how anyone can use other assembler.
1 chioce FASM
2 chioce FASM
3 chioce FASM
...
Mery Christmas!!!! Happy 2007
I hope to obtain new results on this new year. I hope the same for you all

_________________
i don't hate goto
Post 22 Dec 2006, 01:27
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MCD



Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 604
Location: Germany
MCD
I just can't believe there are so many votes for TASM, all different versions I got where very limited in functions and/or full of newbie bugs. I just don't want to tell what stupid bugs some kind of version my last TASM had Shocked

_________________
MCD - the inevitable return of the Mad Computer Doggy

-||__/
.|+-~
.|| ||
Post 28 Dec 2006, 16:06
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dazzit



Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 9
Location: Devon, UK
dazzit
My question on this is what about actual compilation speed.
something like Yasm is designed to be multi platform, multi processor and thusly has generalisations rather than optimisations to accomodate this.
I'm thinking it the general direction of a project involving reflective programming maybe an operating system of some kind and quite frankly I haven't seen anything as fast and as flexible as flatassembler so far.
Post 11 Jan 2007, 11:30
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2

< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Copyright © 1999-2020, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube, Twitter.

Website powered by rwasa.