Index
> Windows > PE file alignment |
| Author |
|
|
marciano 04 Sep 2006, 18:04
I think you can't set the aligment to a value less than 200h (maybe I'm wrong).
|
|||
04 Sep 2006, 18:04 |
|
|
f0dder 04 Sep 2006, 22:53
You can set the file alignment pretty low, but if it's below 0x200 it won't load on all windows versions...
|
|||
|
04 Sep 2006, 22:53 |
|
|
Xanfa 05 Sep 2006, 12:34
hmm...It's processor achitecture ... It is 4kb...
|
|||
|
05 Sep 2006, 12:34 |
|
|
vid 05 Sep 2006, 12:45
Xanfa wrote: hmm...It's processor achitecture ... It is 4kb... no, this one is Virtual Alignment, or memory alignment or however you call it - the other one |
|||
|
05 Sep 2006, 12:45 |
|
|
okasvi 05 Sep 2006, 15:06
f0dder wrote: You can set the file alignment pretty low, but if it's below 0x200 it won't load on all windows versions... what versions dont work with below 200h? with PellesC I've always used 20h and works great on winXPsp2, but I did notice that ie. UPX does not support filealign below 200h... _________________ When We Ride On Our Enemies support reverse smileys |: |
|||
|
05 Sep 2006, 15:06 |
|
|
f0dder 05 Sep 2006, 15:11
okasvi, win9x iirc... perhaps 2k, but can't remember (2k is a bit more "nazi" in some respects, like requiring an import from kernel32 (or one that ends up importing from kernel32)) - if not there, it'll silently refuse to load the executable. NT4 might be worth checking as well.
|
|||
|
05 Sep 2006, 15:11 |
|
|
RedGhost 06 Sep 2006, 13:33
f0dder wrote: 2k is a bit more "nazi" in some respects Windows2000 has superior scientists and engineers and weapon technology but follows an insane ideology? o: _________________ redghost.ca |
|||
|
06 Sep 2006, 13:33 |
|
|
eskizo 15 Sep 2006, 12:20
thakyou all
|
|||
|
15 Sep 2006, 12:20 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|