flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
![]() Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 18, 19, 20 Next |
Author |
|
Kuemmel 12 Apr 2008, 22:59
edfed wrote: pentium III M. is it good? Yep, just try, will be interesting result, should deliver same efficiency like the Pentium M from BitRake... |
|||
![]() |
|
revolution 13 Apr 2008, 02:16
I've got Pentium M (Banias 1.3GHz) and Core Duo (Yonah 1.83GHz) both with 32-bit OS. Would you like me to run a test with these?
|
|||
![]() |
|
edfed 13 Apr 2008, 03:21
i don't know why, but it still scratch my machine.
![]() only the busy cursor appear on black background in 800*600? looks like 98 don't like it. |
|||
![]() |
|
revolution 13 Apr 2008, 03:57
edfed wrote: i don't know why, but it still scratch my machine. |
|||
![]() |
|
edfed 13 Apr 2008, 04:29
what do you think about a bsd?
open? net? |
|||
![]() |
|
Alphonso 13 Apr 2008, 04:49
Hi Kuemmel,
nice. ![]() PIII Tualatin 6-B-1 1Ghz, FPU 0.53F Speed 62.7 +-0.2 You asked earlier about DestroyWindow, there doesn't seem to be any message handling in your program, ie Code: msg_loop: invoke GetMessage,msg,NULL,0,0 or eax,eax jz end_loop invoke TranslateMessage,msg invoke DispatchMessage,msg jmp msg_loop end_loop: |
|||
![]() |
|
AlexP 13 Apr 2008, 05:10
Quote: Ups...but now it's working !? Hopefully no other harm...what is your CPU and MHZ ? Anyone with a Pentium-M here or other CPU's ? |
|||
![]() |
|
Kuemmel 13 Apr 2008, 07:19
revolution wrote: I've got Pentium M (Banias 1.3GHz) and Core Duo (Yonah 1.83GHz) both with 32-bit OS. Would you like me to run a test with these? @Alphonso, thanks for the result, but please use also the 0.53G version in the attachement some posts of me before, as I said it's not on my webpage until now. Thanks for the window code stuff, I try to do implement that soon ! I 'm really not into OS stuff... ![]() @for all who don't know about their cpu: just get CPU-Z from http://www.cpuid.com/ It's a small programm to show all the data of your CPU. @edfed, hm, I don't know about Win98, can it do multi-threading as WinXp ? I think so...then it could be a direct-draw/direct-x thing, I only use directdraw and if it is there in just an old version it should be fine. Last edited by Kuemmel on 13 Apr 2008, 10:32; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
revolution 13 Apr 2008, 07:28
Kuemmel wrote:
Kuemmel wrote: @edfed, hm, I don't know about Win98, can it do multi-threading as WinXp ? |
|||
![]() |
|
Alphonso 13 Apr 2008, 07:35
PIII Tualatin 6-B-1 1Ghz, FPU 0.53G Speed 69.0
|
|||
![]() |
|
revolution 13 Apr 2008, 09:04
Banias 1300MHz
Code: Kümmel Mandelbrot Benchmark V 0.53G-32b-MT-FPU Speed [Million Iterations / Second] : 135.576 Kümmel Mandelbrot Benchmark V 0.53G-32b-MT-SSE2 Speed [Million Iterations / Second] : 145.854 Code: Kümmel Mandelbrot Benchmark V 0.53G-32b-MT-FPU Speed [Million Iterations / Second] : 360.674 Kümmel Mandelbrot Benchmark V 0.53G-32b-MT-SSE2 Speed [Million Iterations / Second] : 400.852 |
|||
![]() |
|
Kuemmel 13 Apr 2008, 10:34
Alphonso wrote: PIII Tualatin 6-B-1 1Ghz, FPU 0.53G Speed 69.0 |
|||
![]() |
|
rugxulo 14 Apr 2008, 21:30
Kuemmel wrote:
That's not small, Eric Auer's CPULEVEL (10k w/ src) is small! ![]() Of course, it says this P4 2.53 Ghz "Northwood" (Dell Dimension 8200, BIOS A09 ??) here supports HyperThreading (which I didn't think it did). Anyways, here's what it says (Win XP Home SP2 32-bit, 512 MB RAM, ATI RAGE 128 PRO II - AGP 4X/PCI w/ 32 MB running vmode 1024x768 32-bit, DirectX 9.0c) ... FPU: 174.980 SSE2: 388.747 EDIT: The version I tested was the Apr. 12, 2008 one (from KMB_V0.53G-32b-MT.zip ). |
|||
![]() |
|
Kuemmel 15 Apr 2008, 09:15
@rugxulo: Thanks for the test...just I think that P4 has no Hyperthreading, according to Wikipedia Northwood P4's with 2.53 MHz had no HT, just the later released 3.02 MHz version...
|
|||
![]() |
|
Madis731 15 Apr 2008, 10:31
You won't believe what my newly bought Penryn just did
![]() ![]() 501.065 FPUMarks and 1541.549SSEMarks ![]() I'm really proud about my system. I just got it on 8th April Intel Mitac 8222J barebone MGM965JB board 4GB of Kingston's PC2-5300's T9300 CPU with whopping 6MB cache X3100 graphics 53Wh battery and 5hrs of working with WiFi ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
f0dder 15 Apr 2008, 10:48
Quote: 53Wh battery and 5hrs of working with WiFi ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
Madis731 15 Apr 2008, 11:39
Can't wait for 64b-MT. Penryn has made some improvements in both worlds 32/64
![]() OT again: I know that they also sell 8/9-cell batteries for those, too. And I'd love to dream about 7-hour trips with no recharge. Btw with LAN/WiFi/GFX/HDD/CPU active, it tells me something around 2hrs end of OT. Coming back to the 64-bit subject I can't recall if there was any talk about it yet (there are 12 pages already), but I know there might be some corners to cut in the 64-bit world, like more registers and maybe free increased precision...which might in turn improve the performance when you arrive the needed precision sooner. |
|||
![]() |
|
Kuemmel 15 Apr 2008, 13:57
Madis731 wrote: You won't believe what my newly bought Penryn just did Thanks for a Penryn result ! Just I think you could have scored slightly higher, the core speed shows 'only' 1600 MHz, I guess you operate in energy saving mode or something ? So I guess when starting my benchmark there's a small time for 'powering up' to 2500 MHz, may be you could run it again in non power save mode or whatever that mode is called... |
|||
![]() |
|
Madis731 15 Apr 2008, 18:33
The shot was taken when the CPU was throttled down. It does it every time its idle. Actually when your program starts up, both(all) cores should pick up their pace. I'll try again
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 18, 19, 20 Next < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2025, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.