Whats the differnce between reserve data and normal data?

Index > Macroinstructions > Whats the differnce between reserve data and normal data?

Author

Thread

shism2

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 248

shism2

Whats the difference between reserve data and normal data?

Ex :

rd 1 = reserve data

Ex :

dw ? normal data

05 Mar 2006, 22:06

UCM

Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 285
Location: Canada

UCM

nothing, in your case.
DW stands for Define Word, RW stands for Reserve Words, but when you put a ? it indicated uninitialized data and is therefore identical.
both *can* have their contents initialized to zero, if there is initialized data after (such as dd 0 or any instruction).

05 Mar 2006, 22:16

okasvi

Joined: 18 Aug 2005
Posts: 382
Location: Finland

okasvi

Quote:

The data reservation directive should be followed by only one numerical
expression, and this value defines how many cells of the specified size should
be reserved. All data definition directives also accept the ? value, which
means that this cell should not be initialized to any value and the effect
is the same as by using the data reservation directive. The uninitialized
data may not be included in the output file, so its values should be always
considered unknown

from fasm.pdf

_________________
When We Ride On Our Enemies
support reverse smileys |:

Last edited by okasvi on 06 Mar 2006, 12:56; edited 1 time in total

05 Mar 2006, 22:22

Madis731

Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 2141
Location: Estonia

Madis731

...but there will be a difference if you put:

Code:

rb 1048576

Code:

times 1048576 db ?

at the end of the file. In the first case your resulting file will be small, but with the latter code you can easily add 1MB to your resulting binary.

06 Mar 2006, 09:39

Tomasz Grysztar
Assembly Artist

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 7718
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar

The "rb 1048576" and "times 1048576 db ?", and "db 1048576 dup ?" have all exactly the same result. The only difference is that assembler processes the "rb" faster.

06 Mar 2006, 12:08

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid

isn't "times XXX db <something>" optimized exception?

06 Mar 2006, 15:52

Madis731

Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 2141
Location: Estonia

Madis731

Maybe I got it wrong then but should they be different as DB defines each byte, but RB can reserve only that byte without explicitly doing any memory-store operations on it. RB only points to the memory, while DB *ALSO* defines each byte in that region. Correct me if I'm wrong!

06 Mar 2006, 17:40

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid

Madis: but defining byte with value "?" is same as reserving it

06 Mar 2006, 17:48

Tomasz Grysztar
Assembly Artist

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 7718
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar

"RB 1" == "DB ?"
They do exactly the same - reserve one byte as uninitialized data.

06 Mar 2006, 19:41

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid

Tomasz: isn't "times XXX db <something>" optimized exception?

06 Mar 2006, 20:01

Tomasz Grysztar
Assembly Artist

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 7718
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar

No, why did you think so?

06 Mar 2006, 20:19

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid

some times it was only way to define long initialized arrays, so it kind-of needed that. And i have some (probably false) flashbacks about you mentioning something like this optimization.

06 Mar 2006, 20:29

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum