Index
> Main > fasm-based code generation libraryGoto page 1, 2, 3 Next |
| Author |
|
|
crc 16 Jul 2005, 22:34
I'd definitely be interested in it.
|
|||
16 Jul 2005, 22:34 |
|
|
f0dder 16 Jul 2005, 22:58
Quote:
Would it mean dropping the main (opensource) fasm, or moving it to second priority? As it is now, such a library could be built from the fasm sources without major problems, right? |
|||
|
16 Jul 2005, 22:58 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 16 Jul 2005, 23:10
Quote: As it is now, such a library could be built from the fasm sources without major problems, right? Generally right, but to optimize it for some specific applications (like the in-memory assembly), some constitutive changes or extensions would be needed. Anyway, the common part of code would be maintained pararell for both projects. |
|||
|
16 Jul 2005, 23:10 |
|
|
farrier 17 Jul 2005, 01:09
Do you take PayPal?
farrier _________________ Some Assembly Required It's a good day to code! U.S.Constitution; Bill of Rights; Amendment 1: ... the right of the people peaceably to assemble, ... The code is dark, and full of errors! |
|||
|
17 Jul 2005, 01:09 |
|
|
f0dder 17 Jul 2005, 01:11
Btw, I wouldn't mind sponsoring you in a couple months when I have money again (being a student and all
 ), I just hope the main FASM tree will remain open and not GPL tainted. And I certainly hope you can profit from it, since it's a very great amount of (great) work! |
|||
|
17 Jul 2005, 01:11 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 17 Jul 2005, 11:00
The whole problem with PayPal is that is doesn't allow to receive money for clients from Poland (like me).
|
|||
|
17 Jul 2005, 11:00 |
|
|
coconut 17 Jul 2005, 15:52
did you not have some info about donating thru iKobo on the sourceforge site?
Quote:
|
|||
|
17 Jul 2005, 15:52 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 17 Jul 2005, 16:03
This service caused some troubles.
Last edited by Tomasz Grysztar on 13 Aug 2005, 18:22; edited 1 time in total |
|||
|
17 Jul 2005, 16:03 |
|
|
Raedwulf 17 Jul 2005, 19:31
Hmmmm as long FASM stays alive
I dont really mind actually...though you need to find people who are making compilers to use the project though.... and wouldn't they(those making the compiler) have sufficient knowledge in asm to make their own assembly generator?
Just a thought....because I'm not sure there'sa market niche for such a project though maybe ytou could find a few commercial compilers to use it? Or could you ahve it like MySQL (free for non-commercial uses) ..? Just some thinking Ralph |
|||
|
17 Jul 2005, 19:31 |
|
|
Kain 18 Jul 2005, 21:57
Raedwulf wrote: Hmmmm as long FASM stays alive Not everyone is interested in the internals of the code generator. Having a set of libraries that can be called from an HLL (like C++) would be of great interest for them. Though I can't comment on the size of such a market and how much they are willing to pay. For example for myself, I would only be willing to pay for a tool if it would help me write a commercial program (which so far is zero). _________________ :sevag.k |
|||
|
18 Jul 2005, 21:57 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 08 Aug 2005, 16:40
The most certainly I will make it free for non-commercial use. Don't know about the commercial, though.
|
|||
|
08 Aug 2005, 16:40 |
|
|
comrade 08 Aug 2005, 20:53
i think there is already a library like that
i will look it up in my bookmarks once i get home |
|||
|
08 Aug 2005, 20:53 |
|
|
THEWizardGenius 08 Aug 2005, 22:22
Quote:
Good! I never do anything commercial anyways, so it would be nice if it's free. That would be helpful since I'll need to make some compiler for my OS, when it's finished (in a VERY long time...) You might think about making it under a GPL-like license, where all programs (even commercial programs), must be open source. That would be cool! |
|||
|
08 Aug 2005, 22:22 |
|
|
f0dder 09 Aug 2005, 01:31
GPL isn't cool if you want to keep the rights over your own source code...
|
|||
|
09 Aug 2005, 01:31 |
|
|
THEWizardGenius 09 Aug 2005, 02:07
Well I did say LIKE GPL, not GPL. I don't think GPL would work very well in this instance, but something similar might. Tomasz would keep his rights but anyone who used it would have to do what he says. Otherwise, they can find a different library
Just an idea. After all, isn't it good to have open source? |
|||
|
09 Aug 2005, 02:07 |
|
|
f0dder 09 Aug 2005, 04:57
Currrent FASM is open source, isn't it?
|
|||
|
09 Aug 2005, 04:57 |
|
|
comrade 09 Aug 2005, 12:17
comrade wrote: i think there is already a library like that this is it: http://softwire.sourceforge.net/ |
|||
|
09 Aug 2005, 12:17 |
|
|
THEWizardGenius 09 Aug 2005, 18:03
I'm talking about the library, f0dder. If people can use it for commercial things it might be nice to force them to make their program Open Source. If the library is licensed similar to GPL then that will happen.
Not that it should be GPL, but maybe something similar. Open Source rocks!!! |
|||
|
09 Aug 2005, 18:03 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 09 Aug 2005, 18:05
However if don't think it would be "nice" to force them to make their programs Open Source.
|
|||
|
09 Aug 2005, 18:05 |
|
| Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|