flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> Macroinstructions > 8) Square root macro for numerical constants 
Author 

MCD 05 Jan 2005, 20:31
Here goes the actual SqRt macro:
Code: macro SqRt Val { if Val <> 0 if Val >= 0;These lines serve to guess a good and fast starting value Acc= 11 if Val >= 100h Acc= 171 if Val >= 10000h Acc= 2740 if Val >= 1000000h Acc= 43838 if Val >= 100000000h Acc= 701416 if Val >= 10000000000h Acc= 11222655 if Val >= 1000000000000h Acc= 179562481 if Val >= 100000000000000h Acc= 2038618457 end if end if end if end if end if end if end if Val= Val1;This is just a rounding stuff repeat 7 Acc= (Val/Acc + Acc +1) shr 1 end repeat Val= Acc else Acc= 1/0;This will intentionally cause an "value out of range" error! end if end if } _________________ MCD  the inevitable return of the Mad Computer Doggy __/ .+~ .  

05 Jan 2005, 20:31 

MCD 05 Jan 2005, 20:32
If you need a faster SqRt macro and you can sacrify some precision, then you
could use less iterative starting value steps or unroll the loop a bit (not sure if this speeds it up?) or decrease the repeat number below 7. But in any case, more than 7 repeats only slow it down. The starting value stuff is difficult to optimize. If you use less steps, you will have to use more repeats. Thus, both too much/less steps slow down the iterative process. I tried out many different step numbers from 1 to 16, and 8 seem to be the gold middle. I tested it with the following code (this may take some time on older machines): Code: repeat 40000h X= %  1 SqRt X end repeat repeat 40000h X= % shl 45  1 SqRt X end repeat Does anyone know a faster square root algorythm than Heron(except the Taylor based stuff)? I would also know a way to optimize the starting value guess by using a "bsr" operator, but I don't think it is worth beeing implemented. It would give something like... Code: ;... Acc= 1 shl (bsr Val shr 1);Small, but very effective ;... ...instead of all these ugly 8 nested ifblocks. _________________ MCD  the inevitable return of the Mad Computer Doggy __/ .+~ .  

05 Jan 2005, 20:32 

MCD 05 Jan 2005, 20:32
Any need for number displaying macros? Try these:
Code: macro DispDec [Val] { if Val <> 0 Acc=Val Divider=1000000000000000000 Highest0=0 if Acc < 0 display "" end if repeat 19 Digit= Acc/Divider Acc= Acc mod Divider Divider= Divider/10 if Digit <> 0 Highest0= 1 end if if Highest0 = 1 display Digit+"0" end if end repeat else display "0" end if } macro DispHex [Val] { if Val <> 0 Acc=Val Divider=60 Highest0=0 repeat 16 Digit= (Acc shr Divider) and 0Fh Acc= Acc and (1 shl Divider  1) Divider= Divider4 if Digit <> 0 Highest0= 1 end if if Highest0 = 1 if Digit < 0Ah display Digit+"0" else display Digit+"A"0Ah end if end if end repeat else display "0" end if } macro DispBin [Val] { if Val <> 0 Acc=Val Divider=63 Highest0=0 repeat 64 Digit= (Acc shr Divider) and 1 Acc= Acc and (1 shl Divider  1) Divider= Divider1 if Digit = 0 if Highest0 = 1 display "0" end if else display "1" Highest0=1 end if end repeat else display "0" end if } 

05 Jan 2005, 20:32 

beppe85 05 Jan 2005, 20:38
Cool!
Why you not put two versions, with an equate naming with routine to use The dev usually will use the precise operation only on final builds. 

05 Jan 2005, 20:38 

MCD 05 Jan 2005, 20:58
Thanks for the reply, but...
Quote: Why you not put two versions, with an equate naming with routine to use The dev usually will use the precise operation only on final builds. 

05 Jan 2005, 20:58 

MCD 06 Jan 2005, 19:06
Anyone else intereted in this SqRt macro?


06 Jan 2005, 19:06 

beppe85 10 Jan 2005, 00:09
The day you form a correct and useful array of assembly instructions, I'll learn a foreign language.
MCD wrote: Thanks for the reply, but... 

10 Jan 2005, 00:09 

Pharabee 27 Jul 2005, 09:01
Im still confused with square root. Fsqrt take 100 ms if I dont made mistake on 10 000 000 loop.
_________________ How to Get work Fast: 10% Skill, 90% honesty. 

27 Jul 2005, 09:01 

MCD 27 Jul 2005, 14:33
As I said already (somewhere even I don't remind where), this macro works at compiletime, whereas fsqrt should be used for runtime square root calculation. Do you know what the difference between compile and runtime calculations is?


27 Jul 2005, 14:33 

Pharabee 27 Jul 2005, 15:50
No I dont know the different.
_________________ How to Get work Fast: 10% Skill, 90% honesty. 

27 Jul 2005, 15:50 

revolution 28 Jul 2005, 04:11
Here is my try that avoids the chain of IF's
Code: macro two_pow_half_log2 Val { Acc=Val Acc=Acc or (Acc shr 1) Acc=Acc or (Acc shr 2) Acc=Acc or (Acc shr 4) Acc=Acc or (Acc shr 8) Acc=Acc or (Acc shr 16) Acc=Acc or (Acc shr 32) Acc=Acc((Acc shr 1) and 05555555555555555h) Acc=(((Acc shr 2) and 03333333333333333h)+(Acc and 03333333333333333h)) Acc=(((Acc shr 4)+Acc) and 00f0f0f0f0f0f0f0fh) Acc=Acc+(Acc shr 8) Acc=Acc+(Acc shr 16) Acc=((Acc+(Acc shr 32)) and 07fh)1 Acc=1 shl (Acc shr 1) } macro SqRt In { local Val Val=In if Val>0 two_pow_half_log2 Val Val=Val1 repeat 7 Acc=(Val/Acc+Acc+1) shr 1 end repeat else Acc=0 end if } macro display_decimal value { local leading_zero,digit,temp,number,divisor number=value if number=1 shl 63 display '9223372036854775808' else if number<0 number=number display '' end if leading_zero=0 divisor=1000000000000000000 repeat 19 digit=19% temp=(number/divisor) mod 10 divisor=divisor/10 leading_zero=leading_zero+temp if leading_zero  (digit=0) display temp+'0' end if end repeat end if } macro show_SqRt Val { display_decimal Val display ' > ' SqRt Val display_decimal Acc display 13,10 } ;some simple range testing rept 64 count:0 {show_SqRt (1 shl count)1} display 13,10 rept 63 count:0 {show_SqRt 1 shl count} display 13,10 rept 63 count:0 {show_SqRt (1 shl count)+1} display 13,10 ;show the transition points rept 32 count:0 { show_SqRt ((count*10+5)*(count*10+5)/100) show_SqRt ((count*10+5)*(count*10+5)/100+1) } But I don't know if the loop counter should 7 or 8 or more/less? My first approxmation is different than MCD gives. 

28 Jul 2005, 04:11 

Pharabee 28 Jul 2005, 04:52
Sorry I made mistake, fsqrt is 4905 ms in 10 mega loop. I think I will made a lookup table for this. I saw menuet OS 3D engine is very fast, maybe there are some info about this.
What about that sqrt function speed? Did someone test it? _________________ How to Get work Fast: 10% Skill, 90% honesty. 

28 Jul 2005, 04:52 

Pharabee 28 Jul 2005, 04:57
Here is my math function coded at MASM, use it for commercial or non commercial purpose.
Before GetSin and GetCos can be use you must call the Phase1 function first. It will be great if we can colaboration on this math function. FASM is have a great documentation, average all the user is a good coder.
_________________ How to Get work Fast: 10% Skill, 90% honesty. 

28 Jul 2005, 04:57 

MCD 28 Jul 2005, 14:14
Pharabee, maybe you should have a closer look into the fasm's programming manuel to understand the difference between runtime instructions and compile time macros.


28 Jul 2005, 14:14 

Pharabee 30 Jul 2005, 06:12
I have understand, function use call and ret instruction thats why macro is faster. My sqrt look up table took 10ms on 10 M loop for gain the sqrt value, it mean 490 times faster than FPU. Im not too understand creating macro.
_________________ How to Get work Fast: 10% Skill, 90% honesty. 

30 Jul 2005, 06:12 

< Last Thread  Next Thread > 
Forum Rules:

Copyright © 19992020, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube, Twitter.
Website powered by rwasa.