flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> OS Construction > Will you be entering the 2nd annual 512b compo? Goto page 1, 2 Next |
Will you be entering the 512b compo? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Votes : 26 |
Author |
|
Dex4u 04 Jul 2005, 12:44
adefeo wrote:
I do not mind at all, as its all fasm users compo . Does any know if decard is still around as we used his site last time ?, i have asked him to run the web site again, as he did a great job last time. If he can not, and i run it, i will not enter the compo . |
|||
04 Jul 2005, 12:44 |
|
adefeo 04 Jul 2005, 12:52
I think he's still around. He just posted in the other thread about the compo yesterday
|
|||
04 Jul 2005, 12:52 |
|
decard 04 Jul 2005, 13:27
I will run the compo this year too. Actually You still have almost two months
|
|||
04 Jul 2005, 13:27 |
|
adefeo 04 Jul 2005, 13:36
Cool!
The only reason I said "less than a month away" is because Dex said in the other thread "This years 512b compo will be started on the 1 AUGUST 2005 and end on the 1 OCTOBER 2005". |
|||
04 Jul 2005, 13:36 |
|
pini 04 Jul 2005, 14:36
Hi there,
I'm new at this forum, and I'll try the compo this year. I'll apply to category "Application", although I'm also programming my own kernel in asm, but I won't have enough time (and/or ideas ?) to build a single sector OS. |
|||
04 Jul 2005, 14:36 |
|
Dex4u 04 Jul 2005, 14:57
Thats great news now that decard will be running the 512b compo, now i can enter.
As it stands now, it will be under the same rules as last year, other than there will be 3 categories which will be: - operating systems - applications - games NOTE: All entry's must fit into 512 bytes and be bootable including the "games" and "applications". Last edited by Dex4u on 04 Jul 2005, 20:04; edited 1 time in total |
|||
04 Jul 2005, 14:57 |
|
drh3xx 04 Jul 2005, 16:42
Would've prefered a 2KiB limit but I'll see what I can rustle up.
Dex4u: I think you mean "... decard will be running the 512b compo..." |
|||
04 Jul 2005, 16:42 |
|
decard 04 Jul 2005, 16:55
|
|||
04 Jul 2005, 16:55 |
|
Dex4u 04 Jul 2005, 20:01
SORRY decard, , i mean running.
|
|||
04 Jul 2005, 20:01 |
|
YONG 04 Jul 2005, 20:15
I'm going to enter, probably in the Applications category.
YONG |
|||
04 Jul 2005, 20:15 |
|
veach1 05 Jul 2005, 07:25
Will these compos be "one by one" or "all in one period of time"?
I would like to participate in applications and games. |
|||
05 Jul 2005, 07:25 |
|
Dex4u 05 Jul 2005, 08:53
@veach1, all in one time period, but you will be allowed to enter one in each category.
|
|||
05 Jul 2005, 08:53 |
|
THEWizardGenius 05 Jul 2005, 21:59
I want to enter all categories, but I think Games is the one I'm most likely to be able to do the easiest. All you have to do is throw some stuff together and you have a game. I also like the idea of making a kernel. And an application would be challenging, I'm thinking a simple text editor like ed or vi... I can't wait!
|
|||
05 Jul 2005, 21:59 |
|
YONG 06 Jul 2005, 08:02
Quote: And an application would be challenging, I'm thinking a simple text editor like ed or vi... I can't wait! It seems that someone will be directly competing with me - I'm writing a 48x64 text editor! YONG |
|||
06 Jul 2005, 08:02 |
|
Dex4u 06 Jul 2005, 09:30
THEWizardGenius wrote: I want to enter all categories, but I think Games is the one I'm most likely to be able to do the easiest. All you have to do is throw some stuff together and you have a game. From my experience, a game is not as easy to do, as you would think. Note: one of the rules is that you must provide the fasm source at the end of the compo, or be disqualified. I for one would find a good small text editor very usefull . |
|||
06 Jul 2005, 09:30 |
|
vid 06 Jul 2005, 11:19
YONG: do you find "vi" to be simple?
Dex4u: i was doing such thing about 2 years ago (very small text viewer (i wanted to make editor later)) + it had nice scroling by pixels (in text mode) + fading on top and bottom edge of text, eg. text didn't just disappear but fade. As viewer it had some 128 bytes, but there were some bugs and i lost sources (like of everything i have ever written 'till 2003). Maybe i'll try to write it again. Too bad i lost VGA specs, doesn't enyone have some? |
|||
06 Jul 2005, 11:19 |
|
smiddy 06 Jul 2005, 11:42
Text scrolling by the pixel, nice. I'd be interested in that. Too bad you lost your code, that bytes! I'll see if I can find some VGA specs...I haven't read much of them but have found a few on the net here and there. When I get home this evening I'll check and post them if I have anything of significance.
|
|||
06 Jul 2005, 11:42 |
|
decard 06 Jul 2005, 11:46
My favorite one: http://www.qzx.com/pc-gpe/vgaregs.txt
|
|||
06 Jul 2005, 11:46 |
|
YONG 06 Jul 2005, 14:09
Quote: YONG: do you find "vi" to be simple? vi is a very powerful text editor. No doubt about that. But it takes a beginner quite some time to master the different modes in which vi operates. So, for beginners, vi is not simple. I've never actually looked at the source code of any versions of vi. So I really have no idea of its complexity. Btw, I'm just writing a VERY SIMPLE text editor, which would not have anything special. YONG |
|||
06 Jul 2005, 14:09 |
|
Goto page 1, 2 Next < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.