Index
> Windows > MD5 CrackingGoto page Previous 1, 2 |
| Author |
|
|
comrade 28 Aug 2005, 21:48
Bogdan is too good for us
|
|||
28 Aug 2005, 21:48 |
|
|
RedGhost 29 Aug 2005, 06:18
revolution wrote:
i am not against reverse engineering at all, hell i got my coding 'career' started by programming game cheats/hacks but usually the license provided with the program specifies that it isn't to be re, so it would be illegal |
|||
|
29 Aug 2005, 06:18 |
|
|
vid 29 Aug 2005, 09:33
Quote: i am not against reverse engineering at all, hell i got my coding 'career' started by programming game cheats/hacks but usually the license provided with the program specifies that it isn't to be re, so it would be illegal In our (Slovak) law license can't forbid you something that law does allow. And if license forbids you something like that, then that part of licensce isn't valid. So you *can* reverse engineer in Slovakia ("to preserve compatibility"), i got that confirmed from lawyer who was co-creating these laws in our country  |
|||
|
29 Aug 2005, 09:33 |
|
|
RedGhost 29 Aug 2005, 11:30
vid wrote:
haha, if i ever want to become a full time cracker i will catch a plane to Slovakia  |
|||
|
29 Aug 2005, 11:30 |
|
|
bogdanontanu 29 Aug 2005, 17:25
comrade wrote: Bogdan is too good for us No, I am not too good for you... I am exactly like everybody else arround here, and I guess that everybody can be like me with very little but honest and passionate efforts. _________________ "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." |
|||
|
29 Aug 2005, 17:25 |
|
|
El Tangas 29 Aug 2005, 20:18
Here is something that I would really like to see reverse engineered, thats the direct assembly code of GPUs. All that FPU power only acessible trough drivers and use mostly for games...
|
|||
|
29 Aug 2005, 20:18 |
|
|
zikachu 30 Aug 2005, 22:28
for md5 cracking, if you want check it..
http://www.hashchecker.com # Checking md5 1 - 7 length plain text which is prepearing charlist 1. charlist 1 - [abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789] - 99.99% # We are now checking md5 1 - 8 length plain text which is prepearing charlist 2. charlist 2 - [abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789] - [ 1 - 8 character ] - 98.50% (will be 99.9%) # Prepearing [ md5 ] charlist 3 - [0123456789] [ 1 - 12 character] charlist 4 - [abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz] [ 9 - 9 character ] |
|||
|
30 Aug 2005, 22:28 |
|
|
THEWizardGenius 31 Aug 2005, 02:52
I don't understand. What is the point of that site?
There are a lot of good things about some types of cracking, and a lot of bad things about other types. There is good cracking, bad cracking, and sometimes-good-sometimes-bad cracking. What is NOT good is to break into someones computer, steal files, put viruses on their computer, etc. This we all know. What vid is trying to point out is that there are good types of cracking, such as cracking in order to learn. In fact, breaking into someones computer could even be good, so long as you do no damage. You could even leave a note that their computer is vulnerable. There are also types of cracking that can be either good or bad, depending on how you do them. As mentioned above, breaking into someone's computer may be good or bad. Cracking into shareware/demo software to avoid paying the licensing fee is wrong, but doing it simply to learn, so long as you don't share how you did it with anyone (except to let them learn too) is OK with me. _________________ FASM Rules! OS Dev is fun! Pepsi tastes nasty! Some ants toot! It's over! |
|||
|
31 Aug 2005, 02:52 |
|
|
sylwek32 30 Aug 2006, 14:51
Maybe somebody wants to make a Port for OpenMosix Linux version?
 |
|||
|
30 Aug 2006, 14:51 |
|
|
vid 31 Aug 2006, 04:59
btw, some Czech guy already beaten MD5 - he can create collision in half of minute (if you haven't heard yet)
|
|||
|
31 Aug 2006, 04:59 |
|
|
f0dder 31 Aug 2006, 13:09
vid wrote: btw, some Czech guy already beaten MD5 - he can create collision in half of minute (if you haven't heard yet) Rainbow tables or some other weakness? Got Link(TM)? _________________  - carpe noctem |
|||
|
31 Aug 2006, 13:09 |
|
|
sylwek32 31 Aug 2006, 17:28
@vid.. i am interested in the link..
|
|||
|
31 Aug 2006, 17:28 |
|
|
f0dder 31 Aug 2006, 21:58
A quick google revealed this, but I'd like some more info... and too tired to refine google searches
|
|||
|
31 Aug 2006, 21:58 |
|
|
velox 01 Sep 2006, 06:15
here is more information about this topic:
http://cryptography.hyperlink.cz/MD5_collisions.html but, from what i understand it's not possible to calculate a collision without having enough input bytes, as passwords are seldomly as long as files. or am i wrong? |
|||
|
01 Sep 2006, 06:15 |
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2 < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|