Hi all!

As a new user of this board I will share the IBasic pro language

Capable of producing fast executables and DLL's. IBasic Professional is the perfect tool for any programming task.

Main Features

Fast 32 bit compiler, assembler, and linker.
Uses standard COFF and LIB format files for maximum compatibility.
Easily upgradeable with add-on command sets.
Integrated editor, source level debugger, and compiler.
Multi module programming supporting unlimited source and include files.
Interfaces seamlessly with Windows™ technologies.
COM support.
Supports Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000 and XP.
Built in GUI/Form designer.
Includes integrated resource compiler.
All tools can be run from the command line as well as the IDE.
Advanced 2D command set (3D and database after purchase)
Inline assembly
...and many more, please read at http://www.pyxia.com

The parser produces raw assembly source code, compilled by the NASM to coff object files (i personally use both languages, in nasm i write custom commands for ibasic using crimson editor as IDE + extra "automated compiller" )
Yes, custom commands! Ibasic pro uses standard static libraries/obj files

IBPro is a new language (~one year ago official released, i've purchased for $99), every month new core update with some new commands, add-ons (the last one: project output->static lib) and very good support on the forum
+No external runtimes are needed to distribute your software

Do not think "it's Basic = it's nothing". I've searched long time for ibpro!
IBPro is better than C, and very easy to learn

also, seeya

Are there any plans to implement a raw assembly output in FASM syntax?

Better than C? That's quite some claim. Last time I saw a claim of that magnitude, it was by a PowerBASIC user - and PowerBASIC has very lousy code generation.

Isn't this board to discuss HLL which use FASM as backend (as mentioned on the main forum) ?

I for one would like this board to focus on any HLL which either already uses FASM as a backend or is contemplating adding FASM and wishes to foster discussion/advice on that transition. Just my opinion.

IBasic isnt as good as it seems.Simple as that.

Why?

Edit: Are you talking about IBASIC (Standard) or IBASIC Pro?

How could you compare anything better than ASM, or FASM for that matter

BTW, the site is down, only an archived copy from Aug. 20, 2007 is available via the Wayback Machine. So much for that product! :-/