flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Home Search Register
Log in to check your private messages Log in

Index > Linux > What Linux distro should I use...

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
MCD



Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 602
Location: Germany
MCD 26 Dec 2006, 09:56
MCD wrote:
One disadvatage of Kanotix is its buggy GUI-based package installer, Adept, which crashes almost on every 2nd change you make

well, that is not a problem anymore, since the maintainer of Kanotix switched to the KPackage GUI installer. (Do i always need to quote myself ? Laughing)

After all, i prefer using plain apt/dpkg for installing packages, so that problem was never citical for me.

Another thing: I am currently doing some everyday-comparisions of XFS and JFS, but there is no clear winner yet.

_________________
MCD - the inevitable return of the Mad Computer Doggy

-||__/
.|+-~
.|| ||
Post 26 Dec 2006, 09:56
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ThreeDays



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2
ThreeDays 14 Jun 2008, 06:41
Installed Kubuntu (Hardy Heron) here. Haven't tested yet how well it goes with FASM development though.
Post 14 Jun 2008, 06:41
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kohlrak



Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1421
Location: Uncle Sam's Pad
kohlrak 14 Jun 2008, 07:04
No more giving back...


Last edited by kohlrak on 07 Aug 2008, 14:24; edited 1 time in total
Post 14 Jun 2008, 07:04
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Reply with quote
OzzY



Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 1029
Location: Everywhere
OzzY 02 Aug 2008, 16:35
I've been happy recently with Arch Linux (it's simple as slack, but with a package manager (binary-based) and a good documentation and community.

I think asm folks should try it: http://www.archlinux.org

Arch is like gentoo, but you don't need to compile anything.

Debian and its derivates is also nice depending on the needs.
Post 02 Aug 2008, 16:35
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kohlrak



Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1421
Location: Uncle Sam's Pad
kohlrak 02 Aug 2008, 21:18
No more giving back...


Last edited by kohlrak on 07 Aug 2008, 14:24; edited 1 time in total
Post 02 Aug 2008, 21:18
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Reply with quote
mattst88



Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 260
Location: South Carolina
mattst88 05 Aug 2008, 17:14
Congratulations on bumping a thread from 2006.
Post 05 Aug 2008, 17:14
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
kohlrak



Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1421
Location: Uncle Sam's Pad
kohlrak 06 Aug 2008, 17:20
No more giving back...


Last edited by kohlrak on 07 Aug 2008, 14:24; edited 1 time in total
Post 06 Aug 2008, 17:20
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Reply with quote
drhowarddrfine



Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Posts: 533
drhowarddrfine 07 Aug 2008, 04:10
How is GNU/Linux not assembly friendly? I rather enjoy it myself. Much more than with Windows.
Post 07 Aug 2008, 04:10
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kohlrak



Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1421
Location: Uncle Sam's Pad
kohlrak 07 Aug 2008, 04:51
No more giving back...


Last edited by kohlrak on 07 Aug 2008, 14:24; edited 1 time in total
Post 07 Aug 2008, 04:51
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Reply with quote
drhowarddrfine



Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Posts: 533
drhowarddrfine 07 Aug 2008, 13:56
You don't have to use GCC. GAS works just fine. I use GCC when I'm interfacing with C, or any other languages. GCC is a great compiler.
Post 07 Aug 2008, 13:56
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ASM-Man



Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 64
ASM-Man 15 Jan 2013, 05:22
drhowarddrfine wrote:
How is GNU/Linux not assembly friendly? I rather enjoy it myself. Much more than with Windows.


Assembly AT&T is terrible. Crying or Very sad
Post 15 Jan 2013, 05:22
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JohnFound



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 3499
Location: Bulgaria
JohnFound 15 Jan 2013, 09:27
Quote:
Assembly AT&T is terrible. Crying or Very sad
Use FASM then. It is anti-terrible. Very Happy
Linux actually is assembly friendly OS. Most C/C++ libraries are not. But it is solvable problem.

_________________
Tox ID: 48C0321ADDB2FE5F644BB5E3D58B0D58C35E5BCBC81D7CD333633FEDF1047914A534256478D9


Last edited by JohnFound on 16 Jan 2013, 06:40; edited 1 time in total
Post 15 Jan 2013, 09:27
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number Reply with quote
KevinN



Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 160
KevinN 16 Jan 2013, 05:39
https://github.com/hawaii-desktop
Post 16 Jan 2013, 05:39
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ASM-Man



Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 64
ASM-Man 19 Jan 2013, 03:38
JohnFound wrote:
Quote:
Assembly AT&T is terrible. Crying or Very sad
Use FASM then. It is anti-terrible. Very Happy
Linux actually is assembly friendly OS. Most C/C++ libraries are not. But it is solvable problem.


I'm already using flat. Smile It's wonderful.

_________________
I'm not a native speaker of the english language. So, if you find any mistake what I have written, you are free to fix for me or tell me on. Smile
Post 19 Jan 2013, 03:38
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KevinN



Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 160
KevinN 19 Jan 2013, 08:06
Desnt look like hawaii/maui is that far along. Just tested it. Im still interested in it. Manjaro linux distro comes in a few flavors btw, all built on archlinux architecture and makes installation/setup a breeze
Post 19 Jan 2013, 08:06
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
sleepsleep



Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 12778
Location: ˛　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣Posts: 0010456
sleepsleep 19 Jan 2013, 10:57
i use these as a recovery OS,

very tiny and awesome
http://www.slitaz.org/en/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SliTaz
http://www.slax.org/

using openbsd for my current development, to run inventory & point of sales (web-based)
Post 19 Jan 2013, 10:57
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Endre



Joined: 29 Dec 2003
Posts: 215
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Endre 01 Feb 2013, 10:56
ASM-Man wrote:
drhowarddrfine wrote:
How is GNU/Linux not assembly friendly? I rather enjoy it myself. Much more than with Windows.


Assembly AT&T is terrible. Crying or Very sad


And who does force you to use AT&T syntax? Both GAS and GCC know intel syntax.
Post 01 Feb 2013, 10:56
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
HaHaAnonymous



Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 1178
Location: Unknown
HaHaAnonymous 01 Feb 2013, 14:46
[ Post removed by author. ]


Last edited by HaHaAnonymous on 28 Feb 2015, 21:49; edited 1 time in total
Post 01 Feb 2013, 14:46
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ASM-Man



Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 64
ASM-Man 01 Feb 2013, 16:40
Endre wrote:
ASM-Man wrote:
drhowarddrfine wrote:
How is GNU/Linux not assembly friendly? I rather enjoy it myself. Much more than with Windows.


Assembly AT&T is terrible. Crying or Very sad


And who does force you to use AT&T syntax? Both GAS and GCC know intel syntax.


that's otherwise when I tried it. I was warned that's AT&T-only. Maybe this is a new feature implemented in a recent version?

_________________
I'm not a native speaker of the english language. So, if you find any mistake what I have written, you are free to fix for me or tell me on. Smile
Post 01 Feb 2013, 16:40
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ASM-Man



Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 64
ASM-Man 01 Feb 2013, 16:49
HaHaAnonymous wrote:
Endre wrote:
ASM-Man wrote:
drhowarddrfine wrote:
How is GNU/Linux not assembly friendly? I rather enjoy it myself. Much more than with Windows.


Assembly AT&T is terrible. Crying or Very sad


And who does force you to use AT&T syntax?

GCC inline assembly? Not sure.

AT&T is the worst syntax ever created in my opinion.


there is worse. Sometime ago I was reading older source codes for a lot of different machines and AT&T close to it,is "cool". The peoples really needed make to syntax a bit more "strage" to make the parsing more easy and don't use much memory,because in such epoch(as you already know) had not much available. A sorry but I don't have more the files.

_________________
I'm not a native speaker of the english language. So, if you find any mistake what I have written, you are free to fix for me or tell me on. Smile
Post 01 Feb 2013, 16:49
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Main index Download Documentation Examples Message board

Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.

Website powered by rwasa.