sorry but ^ symbol is "at the power of" no?

mov eax,2^32-1 can be a good usage of ^
instead of
mov eax,0ffffffffh
no?

me i vote yes







xor mnenonic is not a real torture for me

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operators_in_C_and_C++

But yes, the same symbol is used to denote "at the power of".

The problem with XOR, is that it works with numerical operators, you can't do "(a = 5) xor (b = 7)", but the hypotethical "(a = 5) ^ (b = 7)" would work.

MCD's proposal was to add logical XOR, not numerical, using the same symbol that in C performs numerical XOR.

As an example of usage of this symbol, the "if (~defined theXorParty.multipleUses & setup eq) | (defined theXorParty.multipleUses & ~setup eq)" that you can find on this thread, could be written as "if defined theXorParty.multipleUses ^ setup eq".

in electronics, xor is a cross in a circle +O
and is a dot .
or is a plus +

so why do you all want use the ^ symbol?

if this symbol is implemented in fasm, i hope it will be only for power of

the xor symbol can be % or #

but not ^
# because it shows the windowing of the xor function


and i don't code in C
i have a headake with the other languages than asm
the number of operators and mnemonics size are too much shity for me

Those are used already.

Anyway this topic isn't worth discussing anymore since obviously it will not be implemented. Not in official fasm at least.

i don't use them in fasm
never
so for me it's ok for %,#,§ or °
just "xor" is a simple solution cause it's explicit and it works!