Index
> MenuetOS > Important ThingsGoto page 1, 2 Next |
| Author |
|
|
maslan 08 Sep 2003, 04:57
hi all i think menuetos needs some modification 1- it needs a stronger filesystem rather than fat16 2- it needs to be able to be installed on hd rather than fd 3- it needs a bootloader u can use an opensource loader like lilo with menuetos 4- it needs to have a better look file explorer 5- you can use wine source code to create an emulator to menuetos so that it will be able to run win32 apps see www.reactos.org for more information _________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
08 Sep 2003, 04:57 |
|
|
maslan 08 Sep 2003, 04:59
what do u think ?
_________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
|
08 Sep 2003, 04:59 |
|
|
Ville 08 Sep 2003, 07:35
> 1- it needs a stronger filesystem rather than fat16
Menuet has Fat32 filesystem. 2- it needs to be able to be installed on hd rather than fd Menuet can be installed to a Hd. 3- it needs a bootloader u can use an opensource loader like lilo with menuetos Why dont you use lilo ? 4- it needs to have a better look file explorer This one I actually agree .. 5- you can use wine source code to create an emulator to menuetos so that it will be able to run win32 apps Trying to run Windows applications in a diffrent platform is like trying to hit a moving target. Cheers, Ville |
|||
|
08 Sep 2003, 07:35 |
|
|
fasm9 08 Sep 2003, 21:26
|
|||
|
08 Sep 2003, 21:26 |
|
|
maslan 26 Sep 2003, 06:31
i think menuetos should use ext3 or even ext2 or any journalised FS
it will be more powerful that fat32  _________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
|
26 Sep 2003, 06:31 |
|
|
Oslover 26 Sep 2003, 09:56
What about JFS? There were test carried out comparing the filing system and JFS came out the best for most applications. Ext 3 not so good. What about OpenBeFS?
|
|||
|
26 Sep 2003, 09:56 |
|
|
maslan 30 Sep 2003, 22:41
any 1 of these FS is better than Fat32 coz i'm a Linux User & Programmer  _________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
|
30 Sep 2003, 22:41 |
|
|
maslan 30 Sep 2003, 22:42
any 1 of these FS is better than Fat32 coz i'm a Linux User & Programmer _________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
|
30 Sep 2003, 22:42 |
|
|
maslan 30 Sep 2003, 22:44
any 1 of these FS is better than Fat32 coz i'm a Linux User & Programmer _________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
|
30 Sep 2003, 22:44 |
|
|
maslan 30 Sep 2003, 22:44
any 1 of these FS is better than Fat32 coz i'm a Linux User & Programmer _________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
|
30 Sep 2003, 22:44 |
|
|
maslan 30 Sep 2003, 22:48
any 1 of these FS is better than Fat32 coz i'm a Linux User & Programmer _________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
|
30 Sep 2003, 22:48 |
|
|
JMD 01 Oct 2003, 01:11
In that case, i think we should stick strictly to FAT32
Anyways, with all of these wishes..... people should produce some code and present it for testing instead of just begging and hoping someone else will do it for ya. |
|||
|
01 Oct 2003, 01:11 |
|
|
Yawgmoth 01 Oct 2003, 15:57
Holy crap maslan, did you mean to post so many times?!?
|
|||
|
01 Oct 2003, 15:57 |
|
|
maslan 02 Oct 2003, 18:43
i don't wanna to inc my posting it isn't my best forum & there is no much users here & i visit it rarely so it's just an opinion coz i like menuetos & i'm a linux programmer so i hate fat32 & i like ext3 (or any other journalized FS).  _________________ Maslan I'm searching for perfection so, even if u need portability u 've to use Assembly --- http://www.maslanlab.org --- http://libosdk.berlios.de http://maslanedit.sf.net http://maslancms.sf.net |
|||
|
02 Oct 2003, 18:43 |
|
|
fasm9 02 Oct 2003, 21:54
|
|||
|
02 Oct 2003, 21:54 |
|
|
KiteMaster 03 Oct 2003, 15:15
i think fat32 is sufficient at the moment
cdrom and floppy in the fileexplorer is more important |
|||
|
03 Oct 2003, 15:15 |
|
|
fasm9 04 Oct 2003, 06:46
Hi,
you are right. i wish i could fasm well. -- i have no further comment. |
|||
|
04 Oct 2003, 06:46 |
|
|
fasm9 04 Dec 2003, 20:16
FAT, no more?
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp Microsoft is now offering companies the ability to license for an unspecified fee its ClearType and its FAT file system technologies. Johann_P wrote: According to a /. article that cites this web page MS is going to charge for using their (crappy) FAT filesystem. Another example of how the idiocy of patents and the greed of MS unite in an evil symbiosis. --  |
|||
|
04 Dec 2003, 20:16 |
|
|
scientica 04 Dec 2003, 21:23
Hmm, ClearType, isn't hasn't the technique been in linux for years?
_________________ ... a professor saying: "use this proprietary software to learn computer science" is the same as English professor handing you a copy of Shakespeare and saying: "use this book to learn Shakespeare without opening the book itself. - Bradley Kuhn |
|||
|
04 Dec 2003, 21:23 |
|
| Goto page 1, 2 Next < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|