Hello Tomasz,

Regarding calminstruction?.xcall? (xcalm.inc),
I just realized it doesn't work with (symbolic) literal empty value,
which I think could be very easily adjusted by minor change to the code :
replacing line

with


can you pls consider this small adj. in utility package ?

Thx

Done.

Many thx !!

Hihi

Another one :
since call allows argument to be "omitted when the definition of called instruction allows it",
I think this mandates another slight tweak in xcall implementation :
.... i suggest changing the below

to


Tomasz, wud u pls consider ?


As a sidenote, i noticed u apparently did small change to CALM match - namely removing the restriction that bracket shud not appear in pattern - when using 3rd argument... but unless mistaken, I can't seem to find any note on this change anywhere ? Wud u pls elaborate ?

Many thx
Rgds

Yes, seems sensible.

That restriction was a remnant of an earlier iteration of this feature, and it stayed there because when changing the design I was not sure whether it was still needed. But after revisiting it recently, I concluded that it was an artificial restriction, unnecessary code that could be removed to clean things up.

tx !