flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> IDE Development > Fresh 1.1.8 |
Author |
|
JohnFound 21 Sep 2004, 16:40
1.1.8 is only for internal use. It is not tested under win NT/2000 at all ( actually I simply forget that the site management system will put it on the page automatically - that is the reason why there is no description. )
Anyway, thanks for the bug report, I will fix it first. Regards. |
|||
21 Sep 2004, 16:40 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 09:29
Any news about Fresh?
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 09:29 |
|
decard 24 Oct 2004, 09:54
Unfortunatelly currently John has a lot of work in his job, thus he can't spend as much time on Fresh as he would like to (he wrote it will take 2 or 3 weeks...) So, Tommy, we have to wait, or (better idea) see how we can help to the project. Do you still want to take care of AsmEdit control in Fresh? The most important task now is to implement new version of this control in our IDE.
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 09:54 |
|
Tomasz Grysztar 24 Oct 2004, 10:18
I can finish the documentation of new AsmEdit core to help you with integrating it into Fresh.
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 10:18 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 10:33
I see... Sometimes there are things that we can't control which are avoiding us from doing what we really want to do..
Yes, I will, decard! But because of much school and football, I can't promise fast results... I will do my very best though! That would be nice Privalov! The sooner, the better! But don't be over-hasty... Take your time... |
|||
24 Oct 2004, 10:33 |
|
decard 24 Oct 2004, 10:40
Actually it seems that applying new AsmEdit into Fresh is quite complicated task - for examble because AsmEdit's winproc contains global labels, and Fresh macro library doesn't support that...
But of course documentation of AsmEdit core would help us a lot. |
|||
24 Oct 2004, 10:40 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 10:53
Hmm... I see.. Then we might need to write another set of proc-macros to use in these files only.. - to simplify the updates that have to be done later when Privalov updates the core files? What should these macros be called?
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 10:53 |
|
decard 24 Oct 2004, 12:59
Well, I don't think that such workaround is a good idea. And proably we will have to modify the core too, in order to add some extra data to each line...
So I think it has to be converted to Fresh macro lib. Actually I have already done it, but I had to add stupid equates (bottom of asmedit.asm file) to make it work without modifing core files. btw, Privalov, could you shortly describe how does asmedit store lines? It would help a lot and save my time... |
|||
24 Oct 2004, 12:59 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 14:10
Ok! Good! I will have a look and start the work immediately..
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:10 |
|
decard 24 Oct 2004, 14:14
well, first decide what (if any) changes you are going to make to the core... we should plan the task carefully to avoid problems in future.
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:14 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 14:20
I won't change anything in the core... Only the interface... First of all we should make it compatible with the one we're using today, or?
BTW: You're "test ground" didn't work on my XP pro... Any ideas why? |
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:20 |
|
decard 24 Oct 2004, 14:28
proably to make it compatible with current one you will need to change the core anyway...
can you give me more detailed info? I mean where does it crash? |
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:28 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 14:31
It doesn't crash... But it won't show the control... Return of CreateWindowEx("ASMEDIT"...) = 0....
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:31 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 14:34
Return of RegisterAsmEditClass = FALSE...
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:34 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 14:39
EBP-28 > 00004008
EBP-24 > 004020BF test.004020BF EBP-20 > 00000000 EBP-1C > 00000004 EBP-18 > 00400000 test.00400000 EBP-14 > F5565D04 EBP-10 > 00010013 EBP-C > 00000000 EBP-8 > 00000000 EBP-4 > 00407000 ASCII "ASMEDIT" This is the WNDCLASS structure which is passed to RegisterClass procedure... |
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:39 |
|
decard 24 Oct 2004, 14:40
and wha is the return value of RegisterAsmEditClass?
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:40 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 14:47
It's working when .wc is global instead of local...
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:47 |
|
decard 24 Oct 2004, 14:56
oh, proably because of that 'const'
Quote: ATOM RegisterClass( |
|||
24 Oct 2004, 14:56 |
|
Tommy 24 Oct 2004, 15:07
Yeah!
|
|||
24 Oct 2004, 15:07 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2025, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.