flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> Windows > Windows 10 in S Mode is blocking FASMW |
Author |
|
revolution 02 Nov 2020, 05:54
S-Mode is the Windows name for their walled garden. So you can only use official MS stuff for everything. And of course it is to "protect" you. Although they don't say who it is protecting you from. It certainly doesn't protect you from the spying by MS.
Anyhow, there are a number of tutorials and blogs around that explain how to switch off S-Mode. |
|||
02 Nov 2020, 05:54 |
|
Hugh-Aguilar 02 Nov 2020, 06:35
revolution wrote: S-Mode is the Windows name for their walled garden. So you can only use official MS stuff for everything. And of course it is to "protect" you. Although they don't say who it is protecting you from. It certainly doesn't protect you from the spying by MS. Well, I will Google S-mode and find these tutorials and blogs that I need. Ugh! Everything is too complicated! I'm not delving into this now --- I will deal with it later. Assembly language programming is not my only vice. I also play Go on KGS. I got the same block on their app --- it is written in Java --- I thought that Java was supposed to be secure, so it wouldn't get blocked. _________________ When all else fails, write the source. |
|||
02 Nov 2020, 06:35 |
|
revolution 02 Nov 2020, 06:44
Java isn't secure. It runs code so it can't be secured. Same with JS, Python, etc.
|
|||
02 Nov 2020, 06:44 |
|
alexfru 02 Nov 2020, 07:27
You should be able to leave the S mode. Example (possibly outdated).
|
|||
02 Nov 2020, 07:27 |
|
Hugh-Aguilar 04 Nov 2020, 10:33
revolution wrote: Java isn't secure. It runs code so it can't be secured. Same with JS, Python, etc. Java was designed to be secure. I used the same ideas in my Safety Forth design. Do you think my Safety Forth design is flawed? BTW: I have changed my mind about making Simple51 open-source. I don't want it to end up being sold in the MicroSoft store and/or to become part of Kolibri. _________________ When all else fails, write the source. |
|||
04 Nov 2020, 10:33 |
|
revolution 04 Nov 2020, 11:00
Hugh-Aguilar wrote: Java was designed to be secure. I used the same ideas in my Safety Forth design. I haven't seen Safety Forth. Even if it is "perfect" it still won't be 100% secure. But that doesn't make it useless or unworthy. It just means users need to be aware of the inherent limitations and accept them. |
|||
04 Nov 2020, 11:00 |
|
DimonSoft 04 Nov 2020, 13:03
Hugh-Aguilar wrote:
Java was marketed to be secure. Avoiding pointers gives some sort of potential reliability at the cost of more complex access to low-level features but has very little to do with security (except for the buffer overflow attacks, but whether they’re avoided completely is yet another topic to discuss). |
|||
04 Nov 2020, 13:03 |
|
Hugh-Aguilar 04 Nov 2020, 19:11
DimonSoft wrote:
Security is an interesting topic --- I'll respond to this over in the thread about Safety Forth. This thread is mostly about S-Mode in Windows that I never heard of before, but recently ran into with my new laptop. I will say here that I don't think S-Mode is about security --- I think S-Mode is about preventing programmers from distributing software --- the idea is that, in the future, all Windows software will come from the MicroSoft Store and MicroSoft will make money on it. This has been done before. The Super Nintendo, for example, was a closed system --- all software had to be purchased from Nintendo, and was written only by Nintendo-authorized programmers. Similarly, I had a vehicle a couple of years ago that didn't pass the emissions test because it needed a catalytic converter. I was given a brochure stating that the government would pay up to $500 of my mechanic bill for me. Yay! Free money! The catch, of course, is that they have a short list of approved mechanics. I went to the Mexican mechanic I know and he did the job for a couple of hondo. If I had gone to an approved mechanic, I would have likely been hit with a bill for 8 or 9 hondo, so even with the 5 hondo government grant I would have still paid more. This is fascism --- what Benito Mussolini called: "corporatism." _________________ When all else fails, write the source. |
|||
04 Nov 2020, 19:11 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.