flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Main > Adjusting Initial Thread Stack Address(...?)

Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
vivik



Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 671
vivik 30 Jul 2017, 20:05
I found this article by randomly googling "thread stack address".

https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/adjusting-thread-stack-address-to-improve-performance-on-intel-xeonr-processors

I don't get it. They recommend wasting space on stack for some reason, in multithreaded apps? I haven't heard anything like that before. Is this real?

"Two threads with very similar stack frame images and access patterns to local variables on the stack are very likely to cause alias conflicts resulting in significant performance degradation."
Post 30 Jul 2017, 20:05
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AsmGuru62



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 1694
Location: Toronto, Canada
AsmGuru62 30 Jul 2017, 20:29
Maybe this one:
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/64-ia-32-architectures-optimization-manual.html
3.6.7 Stack Alignment

At some point it talks about the stalls happening when code mixes store/loads with addresses, which are different by a MULTIPLE of 4Kb. Usually stack frames are different by these values.
Post 30 Jul 2017, 20:29
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Reply with quote
revolution
When all else fails, read the source


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20519
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system
revolution 30 Jul 2017, 22:18
Probably their concern is with caching. The number of sets/ways of the cache subsystem can cause aliasing problems (i.e. thrashing) when you have accesses that align in multiples of the cache geometry. Note that the cache thrashing can apply to one or both of 1) the "normal" memory cache, and 2) the TLB cache.
Post 30 Jul 2017, 22:18
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
vivik



Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 671
vivik 31 Jul 2017, 07:05
The first link mentions counting "the number of 64KB alias events". Is it possible to actually receive and count them? How?
Post 31 Jul 2017, 07:05
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  


< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Copyright © 1999-2025, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.

Website powered by rwasa.