I just saw on the links page a typo for RadASM you have it as RasASM
just thought I'd let ya know!

Ah! You did it... none too late...

About RosAsm:

"Very powerfull tool,"

Correct

"although with a little strange assembly syntax"

Wrong. Simply the best one. Not on my fault if others do not conform to RosAsm syntax and not on my fault if MASM introduced a lot of inacceptable stupidities.

"and look, feel and behaviour of the GUI part much far from Windows standards".

Weird. Not on my fault if the "Windows standards" are bad. For example, when trying to solve the completely illogical behaviour of the Standard Right-Click // Double-Left-Click for your own Asm Editor, in another thread, down here, you'd way better to take a fresh look at the RosAsm way for this, and, eventually to do it that way, rather than the so stupid "Windows standards" way. RosAsm cannot be both at a time innovating and conforming to "Windows Standards", because the requirements are specific to Assembly, not to "Windows".

[... and, John, in case you did not took a look since that time, most of your recommandations about the RosAsm IDE user interface have been applied... - Most but the ones where you were evidently wrong... - ]

Thanks for the Link, anyway. I am going to reconsider my recent position and changed about this point, even though Thomasz persists to refuse to move on any ethical point. (...).


Betov.