Stupid topic removed

flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Macroinstructions > Stupid topic removed

Author

Thread

l4m2

Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Posts: 674

l4m2 16 Aug 2016, 17:31

fasm makes INT as a in-fun, while fasng lets it be

Code:

macro int x
  db 0xcc(x=3)
  db 0xcd, x(x<>3)
end macro

yet some still can be macro but builtn i fasmg:

Code:

macro dw [x] forward
  assume x>-32769&x<65536
  db x and 255, x shr 8
end macro

so what's the min?(can add unexisted command)

Last edited by l4m2 on 18 Aug 2016, 03:12; edited 2 times in total

16 Aug 2016, 17:31

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20299
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 16 Aug 2016, 19:34

Please clarify what exactly are you asking? I changed the title already but it is not clear to me what you actually want.

16 Aug 2016, 19:34

l4m2

Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Posts: 674

l4m2 17 Aug 2016, 01:42

Let's say we use only db, macro, match, display, equ and sth. in fasmg(not all), and define other things. Possible?

17 Aug 2016, 01:42

l4m2

Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Posts: 674

l4m2 17 Aug 2016, 04:28

revolution wrote:

Please clarify what exactly are you asking? I changed the title already but it is not clear to me what you actually want.

The title was badly changed from "min(that should be smallest) fasmg" to "a macro that gets the smallest number"

17 Aug 2016, 04:28

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20299
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 17 Aug 2016, 05:54

You can change the title at any time. I was trying to help, but clearly I failed.

17 Aug 2016, 05:54

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum