flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> Macroinstructions > [bug] Using PROC64.INC with initialised strings |
Author |
|
revolution 22 Oct 2014, 08:13
system error wrote: #3 http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=17353 |
|||
22 Oct 2014, 08:13 |
|
system error 22 Oct 2014, 08:32
revolution wrote:
John come here. U need to be spanked! HAHAHA |
|||
22 Oct 2014, 08:32 |
|
revolution 22 Oct 2014, 08:39
This appears to be a bug in the macro. At line 452 we have:
Code: load qword@initlocal dword from name+position@initlocal Moving this to compiler internals (since it is not related to Linux) and stickying. |
|||
22 Oct 2014, 08:39 |
|
revolution 23 Oct 2014, 13:46
There is a new version of the Windows download that fixes this and has a few other small changes also.
|
|||
23 Oct 2014, 13:46 |
|
system error 23 Oct 2014, 19:55
Ok got it. It's in the 1.71.23 Windows package. Fixed.
One question: Why not include it in the standard Linux package? We could use some HLL constructs in Linux as well. Thanks. |
|||
23 Oct 2014, 19:55 |
|
Tomasz Grysztar 23 Oct 2014, 21:40
system error wrote: One question: Why not include it in the standard Linux package? We could use some HLL constructs in Linux as well. I should have created a separate "proc" package for 64-bit Linux, but I never really got to it. |
|||
23 Oct 2014, 21:40 |
|
system error 23 Oct 2014, 23:30
Tomasz Grysztar wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if FASM has its own calling convention? Something like Code: fasmcall ... To hell with C's and stdcall. Invent your own. FASM deserves its own niche and style (or is it even possible? LOLL) |
|||
23 Oct 2014, 23:30 |
|
revolution 23 Oct 2014, 23:32
|
|||
23 Oct 2014, 23:32 |
|
system error 23 Oct 2014, 23:37
revolution wrote: The great thing about standards is that there are so many of them. |
|||
23 Oct 2014, 23:37 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.