flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> OS Construction > NTFS description? |
Author |
|
ntrf 01 Jun 2004, 08:05
Question about MFT
Anyone knows it`s format? |
|||
01 Jun 2004, 08:05 |
|
vid 01 Jun 2004, 10:50
i quess not completely. Even Linux kernel can only read/modify files, can't resize or create them so it probably still isn't fully explored.
|
|||
01 Jun 2004, 10:50 |
|
ntrf 01 Jun 2004, 11:43
I have only Bootsector format.
It's free for download at MSDN. |
|||
01 Jun 2004, 11:43 |
|
f0dder 01 Jun 2004, 17:08
"forget it" ... the only reliable NTFS implementation out right now is the MS one, which is the reason for http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/ . OpenSores people just aren't good enough at reversing ^_^
|
|||
01 Jun 2004, 17:08 |
|
neonz 01 Jun 2004, 19:49
f0dder wrote: "forget it" ... the only reliable NTFS implementation out right now is the MS one, which is the reason for http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/ . OpenSores people just aren't good enough at reversing ^_^ Only? How about http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/ntfsdos.shtml? |
|||
01 Jun 2004, 19:49 |
|
neonz 02 Jun 2004, 01:34
Ok, I was wrong with sysinternals...
But! In my old work, one people demonstred me two-diskette DOS with some third party read-write NTFS driver for DOS. I will try to find out what the hell that was. |
|||
02 Jun 2004, 01:34 |
|
ntrf 02 Jun 2004, 05:25
If you find something - DO NOT SEND ME (whatever it will be)
I disasembled WinXP bootsector and tring to undestand hot it works. |
|||
02 Jun 2004, 05:25 |
|
f0dder 02 Jun 2004, 23:40
two-diskette DOS would most likely be the sysinternals NTFSDOS stuff... or perhaps linux, which has "almost functional" read support and "DANGEROUS! EXPERIMENTAL! OMFG!" write support.
|
|||
02 Jun 2004, 23:40 |
|
neonz 03 Jun 2004, 02:02
f0dder wrote: two-diskette DOS would most likely be the sysinternals NTFSDOS stuff... or perhaps linux, which has "almost functional" read support and "DANGEROUS! EXPERIMENTAL! OMFG!" write support. nope, it wasn't linux. it was plain DOS. sysinternals NTFSDOS isn't two disk stuff, it is few KB driver, loaded from autoexec.bat, and it is read-only (that was read-write). |
|||
03 Jun 2004, 02:02 |
|
f0dder 03 Jun 2004, 11:03
after you add ntoskrnl.exe, ntfs.sy (etc), it's certainly a bit more than "a few KB driver"
|
|||
03 Jun 2004, 11:03 |
|
neonz 03 Jun 2004, 21:12
f0dder wrote: after you add ntoskrnl.exe, ntfs.sy (etc), it's certainly a bit more than "a few KB driver" ntoskrnl.exe loads from DOS??? |
|||
03 Jun 2004, 21:12 |
|
roticv 03 Jun 2004, 22:45
Since when does nt have dos?
|
|||
03 Jun 2004, 22:45 |
|
f0dder 04 Jun 2004, 01:05
Read the docs?
Quote:
|
|||
04 Jun 2004, 01:05 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.