flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> Projects and Ideas > accounting software with new concept |
Author |
|
revolution 15 Feb 2014, 07:42
But there are already so many accounting packages available (both free and paid), and most of them do proper double entry accounting and multiple users etc. by default. They often also provide tracking of stock, invoices, receivables, vendors, customers, ageing, assets, depreciation, taxation, salaries, etc. etc. etc.
What value are you adding that is not already provided? |
|||
15 Feb 2014, 07:42 |
|
sleepsleep 15 Feb 2014, 07:49
revolution wrote:
coded by sleepsleep & friends... assembly language based, money in = cash on hand + money out basically, maybe more simple approach, key in transaction and tag it. no accounting terms, basically, one just need to know, if it is money in, or money out. a reminder feature if it is future money in, or money out, |
|||
15 Feb 2014, 07:49 |
|
revolution 15 Feb 2014, 07:59
Who is your target audience?
|
|||
15 Feb 2014, 07:59 |
|
sleepsleep 15 Feb 2014, 08:29
revolution wrote:
people who want to record money transaction, personal, small business, and those who don't get the complexities in current available accounting software. money in, or money out, tag it, view report based on tag or grouped tags. eg. one choose utilities, or compare tags, eg. company ABC vs company XYZ, money in & out, future money in & out the tag feature could used to monitor purchase & selling item (that is after we reach first goal) |
|||
15 Feb 2014, 08:29 |
|
sleepsleep 16 Feb 2014, 02:59
the gui layout would be,
windows application menu left menu, right scrollable window bottom status bar i will try making the layout with IUP |
|||
16 Feb 2014, 02:59 |
|
tthsqe 16 Feb 2014, 03:16
I remember reading that one of the ibm ppc chips was the first to implement 'decimal arithmetic' in hardware, siting financial calculations as the impetus. Is this a legitimate advance? If rounding is an issue why not just use binary integers with a implied decimal radix point?
Example: $1.20 is not exactly representable, so just represent it at 120¢. |
|||
16 Feb 2014, 03:16 |
|
sleepsleep 16 Feb 2014, 03:32
i was thinking about using 120¢, no decimal, since different countries using different currency, the best would be, 120¢ to represent $1.20
everything in integer, |
|||
16 Feb 2014, 03:32 |
|
revolution 16 Feb 2014, 03:34
tthsqe wrote: If rounding is an issue why not just use binary integers with a implied decimal radix point? OMG!!!! When I divide 120 by 100 I get $1.1999999999!!!!! My CPU is broken!!!!!! Let's use IBM's new super chippy and fix it. |
|||
16 Feb 2014, 03:34 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.