flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
![]() |
Author |
|
bitRAKE 18 Apr 2013, 11:17
Surprised I haven't seen this posted here before, nor could I find it searching. Worth a post, none the less: Found another rather decent amd64 debugger for Windows.
http://duxcore.com/index.php/prod/visual-duxdebugger/overview Interface has some nice features: I like how the machine code bytes are partitioned logically based on contribution to instruction. Also watch and register windows reflect changes in alternate color. Display seems very flexible and featureful (uses MFC dock manager). Display of import calls don't show symbolically until it's the next instruction. Going to play with it some more... Disassembly is done by: http://code.google.com/p/distorm/ Last edited by bitRAKE on 19 Apr 2013, 04:01; edited 2 times in total |
|||
![]() |
|
Feryno 18 Apr 2013, 12:33
seems to be excellent debugger
the company producing it is in the country where LocoDelAssembly lives |
|||
![]() |
|
HaHaAnonymous 18 Apr 2013, 15:04
[ Post removed by author. ]
Last edited by HaHaAnonymous on 28 Feb 2015, 21:01; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
nop 21 Apr 2013, 09:18
HaHaAnonymous wrote:
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
HaHaAnonymous 21 Apr 2013, 16:39
[ Post removed by author. ]
Last edited by HaHaAnonymous on 28 Feb 2015, 20:58; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
bitRAKE 21 Apr 2013, 18:37
|
|||
![]() |
|
HaHaAnonymous 21 Apr 2013, 18:51
[ Post removed by author. ]
Last edited by HaHaAnonymous on 28 Feb 2015, 20:57; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
bitRAKE 22 Apr 2013, 02:32
Well, my biggest complaint with the debugger is the lack of UI state saving - basically, makes it unusable in the long-term. FDGB saves window positions so I have even have different copies of the program to load different configurations of windows.
For example, I like to have a good view of the stack and a couple memory locations. If I need to spend five minutes moving things around before I start reading the instruction stream - es no bueno. distorm3 seems okay, but pintools might be more useful. The license on pintools is even more restrictive, though. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
typedef 22 Apr 2013, 03:03
This debugger sucks. I can't see an active process which other debuggers can see and shows up in Task Manager.
Verdict: Piece of shit. Wasted time on GUI features instead of functionality. Can't even debug some programs. WTF? ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
HaHaAnonymous 22 Apr 2013, 03:17
[ Post removed by author. ]
Last edited by HaHaAnonymous on 28 Feb 2015, 20:57; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
bitRAKE 22 Apr 2013, 03:47
typedef, I completely disagree. This debugger is a work in progress, and much work has been put into processing the output from diStorm, and maintaining context state. The UI is MFC - which he doesn't really use the 4mb of images in the resource section of the program! Dynamic compilation would have been a good idea - to use the mfc.dll.
Of course, it's easy to criticize - these are small things - nitpicking. |
|||
![]() |
|
typedef 22 Apr 2013, 04:25
Aah... Fuck ! I was trying to debug a 32-bit app then.
Oh well, first impressions. I didn't even read the damn title. LOL |
|||
![]() |
|
ACP 22 Apr 2013, 13:07
HaHaAnonymous wrote:
Ok, so at this point I'm not interested since I need a debugger that can handle both 32/64 bit apps under Windows. There is already a good set of debuggers which can handle only one type of apps. Anyway it is good to know about new debugger that already has some potential. Last edited by ACP on 22 Apr 2013, 13:59; edited 1 time in total |
|||
![]() |
|
typedef 22 Apr 2013, 13:52
^^^quote fail
|
|||
![]() |
|
ACP 22 Apr 2013, 13:59
typedef wrote: ^^^quote fail Done |
|||
![]() |
|
typedef 22 Apr 2013, 14:11
ACP wrote:
I thought the whole post was a quote until you fixed it. Careful when quoting ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2025, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.