Stack frames

Index > Windows > Stack frames

Author

Thread

Tommy

Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Location: Norway

Tommy

Hi everyone!

Code:

include "win32ax.inc"

.data

        sTemp db "Test!",0

.code

        start:
                stdcall xproc_ok,sTemp
                stdcall xproc_error,sTemp
                invoke  ExitProcess,0

        xproc_ok:
                push    ebp
                mov     ebp,esp
                sub     esp,0Ch
                mov     word [ebp-0Ch],0078h
                push    0
                lea     eax,[ebp-0Ch]
                push    eax
                push    dword [ebp+8]
                push    0
                call    [MessageBox]
                leave
                ret     4

        xproc_error:
                push    ebp
                mov     ebp,esp
                sub     esp,0Ah
                mov     word [ebp-0Ah],0078h
                push    0
                lea     eax,[ebp-0Ah]
                push    eax
                push    dword [ebp+8]
                push    0
                call    [MessageBox]
                leave
                ret     4

.end start

I don't know whether or not this is a dumb question, but anyway... I'm trying to get more knowledge to stack frames (since I'm working on a compiler)... Why is "xproc_ok" working and not "xproc_error"? The only difference is that in the first mentioned I've "allocated" 12 bytes of local data, and in the second "only" 10... What's the problem? Is there something I've been missing?? Confused

(The error I get is that the MessageBox isn't shown properly in the other procedure... I'm using WinXP)...

Thanks! Any help is appreciated!

Best regards,
Tommy

30 Apr 2004, 16:11

decard

Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 1092
Location: Poland

decard

I'm not sure, but it seems that the stack pointer should be 4-byte aligned. In real (16-bit) mode it should work ok). In 32-bit you should align to dword anything that you put on the stack. I'm not exactly sure why, but it is Very Happy

30 Apr 2004, 16:24

roticv

Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 374
Location: Singapore

roticv

I think decard is right. The stack should be aligned to dword as far as possible.

30 Apr 2004, 17:02

vid
Verbosity in development

Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia

vid

in docs it is writen exactly as decard and roticv told: stack SHOULD be aligned to dword. Nothing about why / what happens if not (of course that some extra processor clocks are taken, but no reason for bug).

Stack is very dangerous to play with (or use in some slightly instandard) under windoze.

just some note: stack aligning is nicely done with "and" instruction:

Code:

and esp,align_size - 1

30 Apr 2004, 20:03

Tommy

Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Location: Norway

Tommy

Thanks!

I was thinking about the same before I fell to sleep yesterday, but I was not sure... Thanks again!

/Tommy

01 May 2004, 06:33

Tommy

Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Location: Norway

Tommy

Well, thanks guys... That problem is now fixed... May I ask you for another favour? Confused

Can someone help me debug the attached program Embarassed

(no asm code included since this file was produced by my compiler)... Thanks!

(The bug occurs while registering the window class)...

Sorry if this is a bit off-topic, but... Sad

/Tommy

Description:	Buggy program...	Download
Filename:	OOP.zip
Filesize:	3.24 KB
Downloaded:	156 Time(s)

01 May 2004, 10:09

roticv

Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 374
Location: Singapore

roticv

If you ask me, your code is wrong...

I think it should be

if (RegisterClass(wc)==0) {
ShowError("Could not register window class!");
}

01 May 2004, 12:12

Tommy

Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Location: Norway

Tommy

It is...

My fault... But when I correct it... It doesn't help... The class is obviously not registered properly.... See attachment... Confused

Description:	Still buggy	Download
Filename:	OOP.zip
Filesize:	3.12 KB
Downloaded:	162 Time(s)

01 May 2004, 13:45

Tommy

Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Location: Norway

Tommy

Forget it... I solved the problem... Thanks anyway! Thanks for all help! Very Happy

Cheers,
Tommy

01 May 2004, 14:03

Tommy

Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Location: Norway

Tommy

Hi again guys!

Once again I have a problem related to the Win32 PE format... Why doesn't the attached executable work?? Confused

(I've also attached the source codes, not ASM, but sources for my own compiler... They won't help for solving the bug...) If anybody can help me, please! Sad

(I know it's a bit off-topic...but...) Thanks!

Regards,
Tommy

Description:	Buggy app - trying to execute Notepad with ShellExecute in SHELL32.DLL" (work if I write it in FASM, but not in my compiler... bug in the PE formatter I guess... :()	Download
Filename:	TestApp.zip
Filesize:	865 Bytes
Downloaded:	163 Time(s)

12 May 2004, 11:06

roticv

Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 374
Location: Singapore

roticv

Doesn't work as in? It does work on my win2k though.

12 May 2004, 11:12

Tommy

Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Location: Norway

Tommy

Hmm..

Not on XP... Sad

12 May 2004, 12:44

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum