Index
> Windows > Fasm-ddk |
| Author |
|
|
ouadji 30 Mar 2009, 23:40
Fasm - ddk <--- clic
(for a good presentation : Radasm Courier New Standard 10) These are the original files created by CT757. But ... ntddk.inc , ntoskrnl.inc and ntstatus.inc have been corrected and supplemented these files are necessary to develop drivers  Last edited by ouadji on 31 Mar 2009, 00:31; edited 2 times in total |
|||
30 Mar 2009, 23:40 |
|
|
DOS386 31 Mar 2009, 00:03
ouadji wrote: Fasm - ddk Heh ? What is it ? PLease post some info. BTW, it doesn't download (is it supposed to ?). |
|||
|
31 Mar 2009, 00:03 |
|
|
DOS386 31 Mar 2009, 00:35
ouadji wrote: Fasm - ddk <--- clic clic ... Nothing. Quote: These files are needed for developing drivers Drivers for what OS ? OS independent ? Quote: Megaupload - enter the code and download the file There is no possibility to enter any "code" Quote: the link is ok, I download the file without problem from home The link in NOT OK (note: I have JS inexistent or off, and I don't collect spyware) Quote: These are the original files created by CT757 COOL. Let's UTFG: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=CT757 http://www.genome.ad.jp/dbget-bin/www_bget?ctr+CT757 http://vx.eof-project.net/viewtopic.php?id=44 http://www.discogs.com/user/Ct757 Quote: But ... ntddk.inc , ntoskrnl.inc and ntstatus.inc have been corrected and supplemented Judging from the 2 letters, it's Windoze only. |
|||
|
31 Mar 2009, 00:35 |
|
|
sleepsleep 31 Mar 2009, 02:27
Quote:
thanks, tested the link, works OK. |
|||
|
31 Mar 2009, 02:27 |
|
|
revolution 31 Mar 2009, 02:43
DOS386 wrote: Judging from the 2 letters, it's Windoze only. |
|||
|
31 Mar 2009, 02:43 |
|
|
LocoDelAssembly 31 Mar 2009, 02:57
Quote:
Yes for me it was also but the problem here was that I silently moved to Windows after DOS386's last post  |
|||
|
31 Mar 2009, 02:57 |
|
|
Madis731 31 Mar 2009, 09:28
I've cached it: EDIT: link dead
(Actually its so small that you could just post it as an attachment and it will always be here) Last edited by Madis731 on 16 Jul 2012, 07:00; edited 1 time in total |
|||
|
31 Mar 2009, 09:28 |
|
|
rugxulo 01 Apr 2009, 12:10
BTW, not directly on topic but maybe someone here knows ... does the FASM (DOS) example DEVICE.SYS actually DO anything (useful or otherwise)???
 |
|||
|
01 Apr 2009, 12:10 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 01 Apr 2009, 12:36
rugxulo wrote: BTW, not directly on topic but maybe someone here knows ... does the FASM (DOS) example DEVICE.SYS actually DO anything (useful or otherwise)??? When you try to read from it, it fills your buffer with 1Ah (End Of File) bytes. That's all. |
|||
|
01 Apr 2009, 12:36 |
|
|
DOS386 05 Apr 2009, 03:38
> BTW, not directly on topic but maybe someone here knows ...
> does the FASM (DOS) example DEVICE.SYS actually DO anything Indeed not the best thread to ask 
Some .SYS'es (also a RAMDISK): http://www.quickersoft.net/downloads/DOSASM.zip - not FASM syntax |
|||
|
05 Apr 2009, 03:38 |
|
|
DOS386 05 Apr 2009, 03:42
revolution wrote: Judging from the forum it is posted in it is Windows. I thought it was obvious from the very first post. NO. You are online 25 hours per day as we all know, but this time you missed 2 things: - It was in Main all the time - It originally didn't contain anything except "FASM-DDK" (see edit notes) Quote: I've cached it: http://nap.koduleht.net/Madis/cache/DDK.7z Link is OK, 47 KiB  |
|||
|
05 Apr 2009, 03:42 |
|
|
revolution 05 Apr 2009, 04:26
DOS386 wrote: NO. You are online 25 hours per day as we all know, but this time you missed 2 things: |
|||
|
05 Apr 2009, 04:26 |
|
|
rugxulo 14 Apr 2009, 20:17
Tomasz Grysztar wrote:
Why??? I know simple examples don't have to actually do anything ("hello world"), but really, this is bizarre to my eyes, no offense. |
|||
|
14 Apr 2009, 20:17 |
|
|
RuthDmytro 15 Jul 2012, 07:41
Thank you for this useful files.
Both links are not working at the moment, so I decided to add archive here. There is an error in DDK\ntddk.inc at line 255. Code: CONTEXT_FULL = (CONTEXT_CONTROL + CONTEXT_INTEGER + CONTEXT_SEGMENTS) halkd.h Code: #define CONTEXT_FULL (CONTEXT_CONTROL | CONTEXT_INTEGER | CONTEXT_SEGMENTS) "or" operators were replaced by +, in most cases it would be ok, but not this time. All three components are summed with CONTEXT_i386 which adds a bit to all of them in the same place. Sum will give result different from OR, kernel may not like it. I think it should be: CONTEXT_FULL = (CONTEXT_CONTROL or CONTEXT_INTEGER or CONTEXT_SEGMENTS) ; and CONTEXT_ALL = (CONTEXT_CONTROL or \ CONTEXT_INTEGER or \ CONTEXT_SEGMENTS or \ CONTEXT_FLOATING_POINT or \ CONTEXT_DEBUG_REGISTERS or \ CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS)
|
|||||||||||
|
15 Jul 2012, 07:41 |
|
|
bzdashek 15 Jul 2012, 10:25
RuthDmytro wrote: ... Good work, comrade. All links are dead except yours, thanks |
|||
|
15 Jul 2012, 10:25 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|