hello i have my function

proc aFunction, FileName:BYTE, FileName2:BYTE, ParameterCount:DWORD, ...

do somthing

endp


the ... defines a variable length of parameter when i call function now i do as:


stdcall dword CallFunction, arg1, arg2, 2, param1, param2

instead of passing it this way is there a way to define proc function that i can pass arguments on stack reverse order like:

push param2
push param1
..
call function

thx for help

Hi, welcome to the board

Is that what you really want? "stdcall dword [func]" and "invoke func", already push the parameters in reverse order (and of course procedures/functions defined with the "proc" macro do expect such order in the stack)

my problem is i have big code in which i already pushed arguments in nearly all functions i wanna make it compatible

dadius, but have you pushed them in reverse order? If that is the case you are good already ("proc" **needs** arguments in reverse order).

The current macros proc and stdcall are designed to work with each other. The order of pushes is reversed by stdcall, and the order of reading by proc matches the order in memory that stdcall produces. Use like this: However there is a problem with variable number of parameters. stdcall does not support a variable number of parameters. For that you should be using ccall and c based procs. Use like this: