flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Heap > reducing car exhaust fumes

Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
matefkr



Joined: 02 Sep 2007
Posts: 1291
Location: Ukraine, Beregovo
matefkr
Hello, it seems it is a special high speed centrifuge connected to the vehicles exhaust system and to the tires. There was a proof of concept model, it separates heavy molecules like co2 from the exhaust fumes and stores it separately, for later reprocessing (or maybe it could be reprocessed on the car).

here is a link:

http://www.indiegogo.com/carbonneutral
Post 01 Aug 2011, 21:45
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JohnFound



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 3500
Location: Bulgaria
JohnFound
The modern ecology is simply very high profit business relaying on peoples gullibility and the trust in the science.
Post 02 Aug 2011, 07:07
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number Reply with quote
matefkr



Joined: 02 Sep 2007
Posts: 1291
Location: Ukraine, Beregovo
matefkr
yes, but this kind of technology could be tested easily just by almost anyone.
Post 02 Aug 2011, 07:25
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JohnFound



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 3500
Location: Bulgaria
JohnFound
Yes, you can separate and collect co2 molecules from the exhaust gases. There are several possible technologies.
But why??? CO2 is beneficial for the plants. It is not harmful at all for the live on the earth. The plants can easy convert CO2 to oxygen and biomass.
Post 02 Aug 2011, 08:06
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number Reply with quote
matefkr



Joined: 02 Sep 2007
Posts: 1291
Location: Ukraine, Beregovo
matefkr
indeed it would be used to be recycled by plants/algae. But in big cities where there are a lot of cars, the concentratoin of co2 and other harmfull molecules is too high to be recycled quick enough by local plants, or for the wind to blow it away. It will just poison the locals.

People would agree to use this system, you could build extensive electric tram network otherwise, but unfortunatley not many people would be ready for that. Or maybe, reduce the useless amount of personal transport. switch short distance transport to bicycles, healthier.

Don't be mad at me please.
Post 02 Aug 2011, 09:13
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JohnFound



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 3500
Location: Bulgaria
JohnFound
CO2 is not poisonous at all. And there are natural ways of recycling of CO2. The concentration of CO2 in the towns is pretty low and not harmful to the nature and humans. Any attempt to collect CO2 and to recycle it in industry way is simply hoax and way to gain some profit from the naive people.
The main problem of the car exhaust is not CO2 but other gases - CO, NO that are really poisonous.
But note, how the advertisement can create illusions - most people think the main problem of the civilization is CO2. Very Happy
Post 02 Aug 2011, 09:55
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ICQ Number Reply with quote
matefkr



Joined: 02 Sep 2007
Posts: 1291
Location: Ukraine, Beregovo
matefkr
i just wrote "like co2" not just co2.

Although if it is high in concentration, then people get less oxigen. The mentioned two poisonous gases would be harder to separate by mass, with centrifuge method. Although CO is slightly polar i believe...
Post 02 Aug 2011, 10:28
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BOTOKILLER



Joined: 07 Jan 2011
Posts: 154
Location: Ukraine
BOTOKILLER
1. You will need centrifuge to rotate fast == wasting energy.
2. How will it store harmful gasses when engine is turned off?
3. All that CO2 and global warming stuff is myth invented by capitalists. Smile

_________________
_______________________________
NSOS
Post 02 Aug 2011, 10:58
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
edfed



Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 4237
Location: 2018
edfed
yep, CO2 pollution problem is a false problem. plants can easy convert in O2.

and behind this easy solution of taxed CO2, they still continue to emit radiations with nuclear centrals, fart pollution with mc donalds, many heavy metal polution in many rivers, but they decided to tax the CO2, that is maybe the only benefic gaz produced by humanity.
it is so easy to say that CO2 is the guilty, so easy. and never the population will think a minimum and find completelly illogic to tax CO2 instead of tax sulfuric acid gaz.
Post 02 Aug 2011, 11:13
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
bitshifter



Joined: 04 Dec 2007
Posts: 764
Location: Massachusetts, USA
bitshifter
policeman: Why were you going so damn fast?
driver: To separate the co2 molecules in my tires.
Post 02 Aug 2011, 12:06
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
edfed



Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 4237
Location: 2018
edfed
policeman: Why were you going so damn fast?
driver: To reach the escape velocity and fly in space, far away from you and your law!
Post 02 Aug 2011, 12:17
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  


< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Copyright © 1999-2020, Tomasz Grysztar.

Powered by rwasa.