Index
> Compiler Internals > Does fasm rely on addresses not being above 2 GB? |
| Author |
|
|
LocoDelAssembly 27 Apr 2011, 20:36
Tomasz,
Motivated by this thread I realized fasm is not using the "large" keyword in the format declaration. Is the code unprepared to cope with "negative" addresses or you are not using the feature because of something else? |
|||
27 Apr 2011, 20:36 |
|
|
LocoDelAssembly 27 Apr 2011, 20:39
Oh, I forgot to check FASMW before posting. It seems you forgot to add "large" to the console version while the IDE already has it.
|
|||
|
27 Apr 2011, 20:39 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|