and, or, xor - are they treated as exponential?
shl shr - look to be exponential, but have 1-unit-bigger priority
why not to merge them: people will bore with Tomasz? - every one gets wrong once, i get wrong often, are you afraid?
not - equals 0-value-1, but -/+ have the lowest priority of 0
Tomasz, just name a reason please.
I'm eager creating some integer arithmetic and need fasm-compatibility, help.
How would you range next operators: "() not neg shl shr sal sar rol ror mul imul div idiv mod and or xor + -"

One thing: never ever put unary - at same priority as binary -. I really hate this.

Your preferences are, of course, the exact opposite of mine. I prefer "-1 and 5" and "0-1 and 5" to mean the same.

As for the priorities of other operators, I don't even remember, where I took them from. I keep them for backward compatibility.

Anyway, since they vary from language to language, I usually use round brackets for anything different than addition+multiplication. Just to be on the safe side.

अह विड् is per se verbosely dictative.

guingol, "This er de la topica"
Noogle knowest not Nepalese.

guingol, i'm sorry for the flame from my side

hi
it's still me but under different name

making the module, several alike topics had been created here and at wasm.ru too(...ideas picking...)
i see no importance in remembering those links as the ones were of research interest making the way here
every time i say all's up, a fix-up appears soon and that seems to be a tradition
this topic was taken as a summarizing because it touches fasm compiler
the work touches some parts of it i'd change, some other questions once raised, not always related to fasm too
having found that macro and the link i wrote all parts for a i386 machine
that would significantly extend fasmcalc

main changes:
i386-code
i387 automatically detected before entering float mode
mmx calculations automatically disabled if no support found
calling simplified

all the developing details, proc bunch, and common user intro is here
i did not produce fasmw's modification - it would be same as in an archive by the link over
that's a pity but no fasmd modification can be done from my side - i do not understand

thanks

i'm also asking you opening '\exe\calc.asm' and translating the strings into your language, and putting those here