flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> Windows > What does the number from "format PE GUI 4.0" mean Goto page 1, 2 Next |
Author |
|
ctl3d32 26 Dec 2010, 20:19
Hi Folks!
What does the number from "format PE GUI 4.0" means? What is the difference if i change it from 4.0 to 5.0 or 6.0? Thanks, ctl3d32 |
|||
26 Dec 2010, 20:19 |
|
bitRAKE 26 Dec 2010, 22:40
Disclaimer: I don't know.
My assumption: 5.0 is linked to changes in the Vista/Win7 loader. Whereas 4.0 is for prior Windows versions. |
|||
26 Dec 2010, 22:40 |
|
ctl3d32 26 Dec 2010, 23:16
Thanks for the reply bitRAKE
|
|||
26 Dec 2010, 23:16 |
|
revolution 26 Dec 2010, 23:39
3.0 is for Win 3.0
4.0 is for Win95 5.0 is for Vista |
|||
26 Dec 2010, 23:39 |
|
ctl3d32 26 Dec 2010, 23:57
thanks
|
|||
26 Dec 2010, 23:57 |
|
revolution 27 Dec 2010, 00:06
∞ is for Win God 65536-bit Alpha-Omega Supreme Deity Ultimate Edition
|
|||
27 Dec 2010, 00:06 |
|
ctl3d32 27 Dec 2010, 00:45
|
|||
27 Dec 2010, 00:45 |
|
SFeLi 27 Dec 2010, 05:42
revolution wrote: 5.0 is for Vista No. Vista is 6.0. A version setting for the format directive specifies minimum supported subsystem version. If you want to restrict your program to 2000+ only, you put format pe gui 5.0 and 9x would refuse to load executable saying that the program requires a newer version of Windows. |
|||
27 Dec 2010, 05:42 |
|
ctl3d32 27 Dec 2010, 15:12
Perfect! Thanks
|
|||
27 Dec 2010, 15:12 |
|
Overflowz 27 Dec 2010, 20:18
same question from me.. but without numbers, what it does ? I mean "format PE GUI" only.
|
|||
27 Dec 2010, 20:18 |
|
ctl3d32 27 Dec 2010, 20:29
These are explained in the .pdf documentation.
|
|||
27 Dec 2010, 20:29 |
|
Overflowz 28 Dec 2010, 09:20
ctl3d32
I can't find that.. without numbers it will be .. ? Any OS I guess ? |
|||
28 Dec 2010, 09:20 |
|
ctl3d32 28 Dec 2010, 10:27
Overflowz wrote: ctl3d32 Sorry, i thought you were asking about the meaning of each word, not the whole phrase. |
|||
28 Dec 2010, 10:27 |
|
fatygant 12 Sep 2011, 19:46
The correct numbers corresponding to the Windows or IE version are listed here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh298349(v=vs.85).aspx
But that's not the point... :) Why can't I run fasm template GUI app on Windows XP SP3 when I put PE GUI > 4.72? Does it have something to do with the structures defined in fasm windows includes? Does it mean they do not support CommonControls versions newer than 4.72? |
|||
12 Sep 2011, 19:46 |
|
revolution 13 Sep 2011, 00:03
fatygant wrote: Why can't I run fasm template GUI app on Windows XP SP3 when I put PE GUI > 4.72? Does it have something to do with the structures defined in fasm windows includes? Does it mean they do not support CommonControls versions newer than 4.72? |
|||
13 Sep 2011, 00:03 |
|
fatygant 13 Sep 2011, 06:26
revolution wrote: What it means is that you are telling the OS that your code requires a minimum OS version of 4.72 to run. It makes no difference what APIs you are really calling, if you state that you need version 5.0 and the OS is only version 4.0 then the OS will conclude that it is not capable to run your program. |
|||
13 Sep 2011, 06:26 |
|
LocoDelAssembly 13 Sep 2011, 15:47
fatygant, as revolution mentioned, you are mixing up OS versions and API versions. My Windows XP for instance is version 5.1.2600 (as pointed out by cmd.exe), then I have comctl32.dll version 5.82.2900.6028 and comdlg32.dll version 6.0.2900.5512 (I don't know why the former isn't version 6.0 too).
[edit]Under \WINDOWS\WinSxS directory tree I have comctl32.dll version 6.0.2600.0 somewhere[/edit] |
|||
13 Sep 2011, 15:47 |
|
fatygant 14 Sep 2011, 08:48
Loco, so GUI 4.0 (as in standard fasm template for Win32 apps) means that the software needs at least Windows 95 to run? And has nothing to do with comctl32.dll versions? O, shit...
I am so dumb... But after your clarification a little bit less dumber. Thanks! Here come Windows versions for those of you who may be in need of such information: Windows 1.0 [1.04] Windows 2.0 [2.11] Windows 3.0 [3] Windows NT 3.1 [3.10.528] Windows for Workgroups 3.11 [3.11] Windows NT Workstation 3.5 [3.5.807] Windows NT Workstation 3.51 [3.51.1057] Windows 95 [4.0.950] Windows NT Workstation 4.0 [4.0.1381] Windows 98 [4.1.1998] Windows 98 Second Edition [4.1.2222] Windows Me [4.90.3000] Windows 2000 Professional [5.0.2195] Windows XP [5.1.2600 Current SP3] Windows XP Professional x64 Edition [5.2.3790] Windows Vista [6.0.6000 Current Version changed to 6.0.6002 with SP2] Windows 7 [6.1.7600 RTM] |
|||
14 Sep 2011, 08:48 |
|
Madis731 14 Sep 2011, 17:08
And if you compile your GUI dialog in XP with PE GUI 3.1, then the buttons and some other stuff will look ugly (Windows 3.11-like ) http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/windows3xer.jpg
|
|||
14 Sep 2011, 17:08 |
|
Goto page 1, 2 Next < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.