Index
> Compiler Internals > %fasminc% is deprecatedGoto page 1, 2 Next |
| Author |
|
|
revolution
sleepsleep wrote: i wrote something lately. |
|||
16 Dec 2010, 13:15 |
|
|
vid
Unfortunatelly...
|
|||
|
16 Dec 2010, 13:45 |
|
|
sleepsleep
hahaha. I think no harm with fasminc right?
Just dont want to be same like c.. |
|||
|
16 Dec 2010, 17:23 |
|
|
revolution
sleepsleep wrote: hahaha. I think no harm with fasminc right? |
|||
|
16 Dec 2010, 23:16 |
|
|
sleepsleep
revo, huhuhu, what doesn't work?
|
|||
|
16 Dec 2010, 23:46 |
|
|
revolution
fasm won't be able to find the includes. fasm only looks for includes from the "INCLUDE" environment variable. "FASMINC" is wrong because no program is looking there.
|
|||
|
16 Dec 2010, 23:54 |
|
|
sleepsleep
u mean fasm assembler or the provided fasm editor?
I am kinda confuse... |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 00:08 |
|
|
sleepsleep
i don't have "INCLUDE" environment variables.
and i use only the defined "FASMINC", and it works.... and i really confuse right now,,, huhuuu |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 04:51 |
|
|
revolution
Perhaps all of your files are in the same folder. Put your asm file in a different folder and test.
Anyhow, look at "TABLES.INC" and you will see the name of the environment variable. |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 06:13 |
|
|
SFeLi
sleepsleep wrote: i don't have "INCLUDE" environment variables. You're using include "%fasminc%/win32a.inc". Fasm expands environment variables and that's why it works. Revolution is talking about include 'win32a.inc' case. Don't you think it is much simpler? |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 06:56 |
|
|
Tyler
Couldn't you just use fix to define fasminc as include, or is include processed b4 fix?
|
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 06:58 |
|
|
JohnFound
Hm, it is strange to have "INCLUDE" environment variable hard coded in the source. I didn't noticed it till now...
It is not documented as well: Quote: The quoted path can contain environment variables enclosed within % Note1: The hard coded "%include%" does not concerns "file" directive. Note2: This topic turned to the "compiler internals" forum section...  |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 08:40 |
|
|
revolution
Tyler wrote: Couldn't you just use fix to define fasminc as include, or is include processed b4 fix? |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 09:30 |
|
|
SFeLi
JohnFound, it is documented in 1.1.1 System requirements.
|
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 09:54 |
|
|
JohnFound
SFeLi wrote: JohnFound, it is documented in 1.1.1 System requirements. No, it is not: http://flatassembler.net/docs.php?article=manual#1.1.1 |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 10:50 |
|
|
SFeLi
Hmm. I was talking about a PDF from Win32 package. Didn't know that there are differences in documentation.
 FASM.pdf wrote: The example source provided with this version require you have environment variable INCLUDE set to the path of the include directory, which is the part of flat assembler package. |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 11:10 |
|
|
JohnFound
SFeLi wrote: Hmm. I was talking about a PDF from Win32 package. Didn't know that there are differences in documentation. Neither I. But, the text from 1.1.1 means (for me) simply that all examples use "%include%" environment variable in it's sources. This text tells nothing about the behaviour of "include" directive, that uses %include% as it's default directory, even if the variable %include% does not exists in the source. Anyway, we have to wait a little for some comment from Tomasz. |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 11:32 |
|
|
shoorick
in winasm studio i made %FASMINC% optionally autogenerated from path to fasm.exe. you can do the same in fasmw (or other IDE) to not spend much time on this question
 if you will refuse of FASMINC, anyway you will meet it all the time in various sources of other authors, so what you will prefer? to refuse of them? to edit all of them? or to be able to ignore this difference forever?
regards! |
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 13:57 |
|
|
vid
IIRC, FASMW takes value for INCLUDE from some INI file.
|
|||
|
17 Dec 2010, 14:17 |
|
| Goto page 1, 2 Next < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|